Search for: "S. W., an individual" Results 6441 - 6460 of 11,737
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2014, 9:46 am by Lovechilde
  That’s where danger lies in American life. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 2:10 pm
  “[W]hether providing information to the FDA would have changed the FDA’s conclusion” was an entirely different matter, and was “a fraud-on-the-FDA theory which was rejected by the Supreme Court in Buckman. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 5:28 pm by Inside Privacy
In accordance with the Policy Statement, DOJ employed a flexible “rule of reason” analysis to evaluate TruSTAR’s request. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 5:01 am
  It disposed of that issue relatively quickly, noting that [w]e are not aware of any case law nor has [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 1:16 pm by Dale Carpenter
He was the first Republican appointee, after all, to rule in favor of the individual mandate imposed by the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 10:50 am by Joe Consumer
Supreme Court brief filed yesterday, these local chambers write that they and their business members, [w]ere negatively impacted to one extent or another by the events of April 20, 2010 and the subsequent economic and environmental disaster caused by [BP]’s gross negligence. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 7:06 pm
Then, either a few (or even many) years later, the court can "discover", say, that the case of W. vs. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:36 am by Amy Howe
  In a post at the National Constitution Center’s Constitution Daily, Jeffrey Shulman suggests that “[w]hat makes this case interesting . . . is not the merits of the department’s justifications for its grooming policy, but the burden of proof under which the department will have to labor. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 3:53 pm by Chuck Cosson
  As FTC Commissioner Julie Brill recently noted, “[w]hether and how consumer profiles based on big data are used to discriminate or treat consumers unfairly involves many subtle and difficult questions. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 4:30 pm by Jane Chong
Judge Kessler’s order grants the motion with the following modifications: all identifiers of individuals in the videotapes (i.e., faces other than Mr. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 12:24 pm by Jamie LaPlante
(See our previous post) Specifically, covered contractors would be required to submit total W-2 compensation for each EEO-1 job category for each race, ethnicity, and sex. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 8:24 am by Joy Waltemath
The Eighth Circuit concluded that the balance of common-law factors utilized to determine whether an individual is an individual contractor for purposes of the ADA and ADEA, which the U.S. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 1:02 am by JP Sarmiento
Our client’s individual hearing was scheduled on September 29, 2014 at the Memphis Immigration Court. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 5:17 pm by Nadia Kayyali
[W]e're already underway building better tools for authenticating the Sister Romas of the world while not opening up Facebook to bad actors. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 7:23 pm by Steve Vladeck
” Of course, that’s not “Article III’s prime role. [read post]