Search for: "STATE V. POWERS"
Results 6441 - 6460
of 41,391
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
Professor Bulman-Pozen’s metaphor is suggestive, but there is a more powerful effect of cross-state diffusion at work: the growing ability of nationally-based movement organizations to pressure state legislators across state lines. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 3:32 pm
" Boxill v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 2:44 pm
” California Assemblyman Marc Levine added: “If the Supreme Court acknowledges that these types of laws are constitutional, California should exert every power necessary to protect human life…We need to have the premier leader in the state, the governor, leading on these very challenging issues. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
Anderson talk about the case of Trump v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 8:33 am
At this point, the Supreme Court issued Lucia v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 7:43 am
For example, he wrote a powerful concurrence in Preterm Cleveland v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 7:36 am
Joint Employment In Jinks v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 6:04 am
V. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
More recently, on December 3, the US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed the ban in the case of Gun Owners of Am., Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 2:00 am
Lockhart v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 2:00 am
Lockhart v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm
In allowing abortion providers to sue only a narrow set of state officials, the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 3:52 pm
Supreme Court Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2021-2022update.htmlTwo petitions for certiorari were filed last week on 12/3/21: United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 1:31 pm
Congress recognized how much power it was giving copyright owners in this scheme, so it tried to curb takedown notice abuse in a few ways. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 11:47 am
It is the takings clause, which regulates the power of eminent domain. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 11:37 am
FDA v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 10:36 am
In Torres v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 10:33 am
If valid, the rule would nullify all contrary state and local regulations, as the power to regulate nationally is the power to preempt locally. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 4:27 am
States can of course create rights going beyond those protected by the Convention, but their power to do so exists independently of the Convention and is subject to their own established constitutional principles. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 4:00 am
That decision was upheld by the Federal Court of Appeal in 3510395 Canada Inc. v. [read post]
