Search for: "STEVENS v. THE STATE"
Results 6441 - 6460
of 7,830
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2009, 10:48 am
At Monday's oral argument in Nijhawan v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 8:48 am
The decision below, which held for the state, is vacated and remanded in a 7-2 opinion by Justice Stevens available here. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 7:35 am
The decision below, which held for the state, is vacated and remanded in a 6-3 opinion by Justice Stevens available here. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 7:24 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 7:04 am
The decision below, which held for the state, is vacated and remanded in a 7-2 opinion by Justice Stevens available here. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 1:00 pm
The question arises in Kucana v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 11:04 pm
One answer may be found in a decision by EDNY Judge Gleeson, United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 8:05 pm
In Frances W. v Steven M., 15 Misc.3d 839 (Fam. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 1:07 pm
In his column, Milbank pokes fun at the Supreme Court justices hearing the oral arguments of Ricci v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 11:23 am
The first is in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 5:47 am
This year, it will hear the case of United States of America v. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 6:29 am
Ed. 2d 502 (1983) (Stevens, J., concurring); United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 3:21 am
The case is Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 4:43 am
Stevens, 529 U.S. 765 (2000). [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 8:15 pm
The Justice Department is asking the Supreme Court to overrule Michigan v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 8:18 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 7:46 am
In Van Devent v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 4:20 am
Furthermore, federal and state government regulators frequently lack the resources and political support to perform effective oversight functions or bring enforcement actions. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 6:17 pm
The Supreme Court held oral argument in the Ricci v. [read post]
