Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 6441 - 6460 of 15,316
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2016, 11:03 am
 | Good news and bad news for bio-pharmaceutical patenting in the United States | HP? [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 4:27 pm by Giles Peaker
From the client’s evidence: “At around that time, Mr Gregory told me that it would be better if MAL acted in person, because (a) Charles Henry had some difficulties with the Law Society (b) PPCI’s solicitor was using criticism of Charles Henry to muddy the case and (c) The personal antagonism between PPCI’s solicitor and Mr Gregory was a distraction from the real issues. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  Here, the plain language of section 1395w-26(b)(3) plainly spells out Congress’s intent that the standards governing Medicare Advantage plans will displace “any State law or regulation” except for State laws regarding licensing or plan solvency. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 4:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Specifically, Mr Shao knew of increased costs, additional equipment lease expenses, delays in receiving payments from Chinese state-owned customers and increased costs of approximately A$1 million in preparing for the IPO. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 11:52 am by Kevin
Said means entailed the mounting of one (1) Colt 1860 revolver C on wooden platform A, supported by frame B, with the revolver’s trigger linked by rod G and lever D to treadle I; when varmint V stepped upon treadle I, lever D would be released and its front end propelled upward by spring H, moving rod G rearward and triggering Colt 1860 revolver C, thereby destroying varmint V. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 6:16 am by Eliana Baer
Just ahead of the effective date of the statute, Judge Jones issued an opinion on the effect of one child’s emancipation in Harrington v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 2:04 am
Ellie Wilson brings you the story.CJEU: "Flat-rate" reimbursement for legal fees must cover a significant part of the costs incurred by the successful party In Case C-57/15 United Video Properties, the CJEU held that while Article 14 Enforcement Directive does not prohibit flat-rate reimbursement of legal costs per se, it sets limits on how Member States can set the flat-rate. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 7:39 am by Jay
  The Court’s reasoning in Rodriguez was that a when an individual does not have immigration status and is subject to deportation, the jury should consider this factor of potential deportation in determining how much money the injured party could make in the future.Rodriguez had a chilling effect and pressured undocumented injured plaintiffs in a personal injury lawsuit from choosing between (a) revealing their immigration status in a public trial and being subjected to… [read post]