Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 6441 - 6460
of 28,965
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2011, 2:41 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Rosenberg v. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 9:31 am
See Distler v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm
In Buckley v. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 6:33 am
" United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 9:39 am
In Eminisor v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 6:33 pm
See,e .g., United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 10:26 am
In Surefoot LC v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 10:17 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 11:21 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 8:00 pm
Below, Alexandra Lampert of Stanford Law School recaps Monday’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 10:01 pm
United States District Court Judge Thelton E. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 8:11 am
(c) The communication furthermore announced that, should the applicant ask for a decision on the state of the file without filing further requests, amendments or comments, the application would then be refused "based on the above arguments taken in combination with the arguments provided in the summons" (see communication B, point 3).V. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 8:13 am
At issue in the case is whether a judge can order a detainee released onto United States soil. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 5:03 pm
In United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 4:56 am
Marckenson v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 4:04 pm
The Supreme Court heard argument today in Bullcoming v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 6:03 pm
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 12:21 am
Bywaters v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
They made the following pertinent observations: applying Swift v Secretary of State for Justice [2013] EWCA Civ 193, under the Convention a state need only pursue a legitimate aim in a proportionate way: Strasbourg does not demand that it do any more; the court must give considerable weight to informed legislative choices, at least where the state is seeking to reconcile the competing interests of different groups in society; and a legislative or regulatory… [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 4:34 am
Here is an excerpt from that case:This case requires us to reexamine the jurisdictional boundary between the Tucker Act and the Administrative Procedure Act, as that boundary is understood in the light of the Supreme Court's decision in Bowen v. [read post]