Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 6441 - 6460
of 25,996
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2010, 2:06 am
State v. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 2:51 am
In May 2013, the Court of Appeal for England and Wales in HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc.[2013] EWCA Civ 451 [on which see Norman Sierbrasse's guest Katpost here] unanimously affirmed Mr Justice Floyd's decision (in HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc. [2012] EWHC1789) with respect to the slide-to-unlock patent and held that “all the claims of 022 [Apple’s slide to unlock patent] are obvious in the light of Neonode” (paragraph 363). [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 5:00 pm
State). [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
"The tests applied in determining if an impairment is reasonable and necessary under a "less deference scrutiny" analysis, must be shown that the state did not:"(1) consider impairing the contracts on par with other policy alternatives; or "(2) impose a drastic impairment when an evident and more moderate course would serve its purpose equally well; nor "(3) act unreasonably in light of the surrounding circumstances. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 2:24 am
In People v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 8:32 am
The conditions include inter alia stating the full amount of the credit. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 11:09 am
Johnson v Mayor and City Council of Gaithersburg, 2021 WL 1233394 (MD 3/31/2021) [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 5:00 am
The question is whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, "a rational trier of fact could find the existence of the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
1 May 2008, 12:14 pm
Mr Omar refused the offer, stating that his infant son had a further hospital appointment at Kensington & Chelsea. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit for further consideration in light of Bilski v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:54 am
By Eric Goldman IO Group v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 9:44 am
But now, hiQ has rightly concluded that it has no argument on the merits in light of the revelations during discovery. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 9:07 am
Pusateri v. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 5:08 pm
A New York Family Lawyer said this is an appeal brought before the Supreme Court on the issue of whether Domestic Relations Law § 72, New York's grandparental visitation statute, is unconstitutional on its face in light of the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Troxel v Granville (530 US 57). [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 8:30 am
When asked about the new court rule, Grabel was quoted as saying, “The new rule is really based on the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (Rule 26.3) and came to light in consideration in the case of “People v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 10:39 am
The second, In re Boloro (Appeal nos. 2019-2349, -2351, -2353), Sept. 16, 2021, was an order by the Federal Circuit remanding the case to allow Bolero to request Director rehearing of the final written decisions in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 12:52 pm
US v Almanazar, March 4, 2011. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 6:12 am
OE submits that a national of a Member State other than the State of the forum is entitled to invoke the jurisdiction of the courts of that latter State under the sixth indent of Article 3(1)(a) of Regulation No 2201/2003, on the basis of observance of the principle of non-discrimination on grounds of nationality, after having resided in the territory of that latter State for only six months immediately before making the application for divorce, which is… [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 3:38 am
The Supreme Court remanded the case for reconsideration in light of Hall Street. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 5:16 am
U.S. v. [read post]
