Search for: "TRIAL COURT ADMINISTRATION"
Results 6441 - 6460
of 23,833
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2019, 11:30 am
She recants, but a state court determines the recantation was not credible, and the Colorado Supreme Court declines to order a new trial. [read post]
24 May 2019, 11:20 am
Instead, he is relying on incendiary rhetoric and court challenges. [read post]
24 May 2019, 11:20 am
Instead, he is relying on incendiary rhetoric and court challenges. [read post]
24 May 2019, 8:00 am
Related blog posts: Illinois Appellate Court Affirms Trial Court’s Decision on Claim of Ownership of Four Works of Art Illinois Appellate Court Finds No Evidence of Bad Faith in Estate Dispute Illinois Appellate Court Vacates and Remands Case Dismissed; Contest Over Mutual Last Will and Testament [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:59 am
” Those have been defined by the Supreme Court as actions of legislatures (federal or state) that single out a specific individual (or entity), declare that person or entity to be guilty, and impose punishment – all without a court trial. [read post]
23 May 2019, 9:30 pm
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
23 May 2019, 1:34 pm
The Patent Trial and Appeals Board (the “Board”) previously held in its inter partes review (“IPR”) that claims 1-22 of Eli Lilly’s U.S. [read post]
23 May 2019, 8:00 am
Depositions and other discovery were completed; the trial court entered summary judgment on Osco’s motion finding that it did not owe Urbaniak the duty of care it was alleged to have breached. [read post]
23 May 2019, 5:00 am
The administrators of the estate sued the device maker and its agents in Philadelphia County. [read post]
23 May 2019, 2:20 am
A Criminal Court and Family Court “hat trick” by Crotty Saland PC’s defense team? [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm
As house supervisors, the Nurses served as administrative representatives and supervised other nurses at the Hospital. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:00 am
” The Relevant Legal Principles The Supreme Court of Canada held that a publication ban should only be ordered where: such an order is necessary to prevent serious risk to the proper administration of justice because reasonable alternative measures will not prevent the risk; and,the salutary effects of the publication ban outweigh deleterious effects on the rights and interests of the parties and the public, including the effects on the right to free expression, the… [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:00 am
” The Relevant Legal Principles The Supreme Court of Canada held that a publication ban should only be ordered where: such an order is necessary to prevent serious risk to the proper administration of justice because reasonable alternative measures will not prevent the risk; and,the salutary effects of the publication ban outweigh deleterious effects on the rights and interests of the parties and the public, including the effects on the right to free expression, the… [read post]
21 May 2019, 11:05 am
B283799, the California Court of Appeals reviewed whether the trial court should have admitted evidence of other prior misconduct on the part of a teacher to show that the Los Angeles Unified School District had notice that the teacher had a propensity to commit sexual abuse of students.[1] Procedural and factual background of the case D.Z. was a 16-year-old girl who was expelled from her previous high school because she reportedly threw a book at the school’s dean. [read post]
21 May 2019, 3:46 am
Supreme Court last year in Oil States rejected a constitutional challenge to the Patent Trial & Appeal Board’s authority to invalidate patents in post-grant reviews, patent owners in the United States have started exploring other constitutional challenges to these PTAB proceedings. [read post]
20 May 2019, 12:29 pm
The trial court found that “[t]he 90-case threshold was not hard to exceed in part because the threshold never was adjusted to account for increased efficiencies occasioned by computerization of the records and use of more experienced analysts. [read post]
20 May 2019, 11:15 am
The patent was challenged in three separate inter partes review (“IPR”) proceedings and in a bench trial before the U.S. [read post]
20 May 2019, 10:55 am
We acknowledge, though, that no holding or dicta of the Supreme Court addresses, much less re [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:18 am
The trial court overruled defense counsel’s objection. [read post]
20 May 2019, 8:00 am
As a result, the appellate court affirmed the trial court’s decision granting the summary judgment motion dismissing Countryside. [read post]
