Search for: "Test Plaintiff"
Results 6441 - 6460
of 21,970
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2018, 4:07 am
Cross-posted at Just Security.Not surprisingly, most early reports of the Supreme Court’s decision last Tuesday in Trump v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:01 am
The plaintiffs alleged that the Department’s recruiting procedures, including a written personnel test, discriminated against racial minorities, claiming that the test was unrelated to job performance and excluded a disproportionate number of black applicants. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:53 am
Of all the names on President Donald Trump’s list of potential Supreme Court nominees, Don Willett’s may be the best known outside rarefied legal circles. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:46 am
The test has evolved over the years, which shows us that janitors and the test will stay. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 8:41 am
The plaintiffs were test-driving a car owned by a dealership. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 8:41 am
The plaintiffs were test-driving a car owned by a dealership. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 7:33 am
A federal court dismissed the plaintiff’s claims that the employer violated his right to privacy because the plaintiff made no attempt to keep his smoking private: he testified to smoking outdoors and purchasing cigarettes with coworkers. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:48 pm
When then-candidate Donald Trump released his first two lists of potential Supreme Court nominees in May and September of 2016, the omission of Judge Brett Kavanaugh of the U.S. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm
In their Motions to Remand, Plaintiffs argued that: (1) the removal was not timely because Defendants had notice of the grounds alleged in the removal notice more than thirty days before the cases were removed, (2) Defendants could not satisfy the test for substantial federal question jurisdiction set forth by the United States Supreme Court, and (3) the Defendants could not satisfy the second, third, and fourth requirements of the jurisdictional test for “Federal… [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm
In their Motions to Remand, Plaintiffs argued that: (1) the removal was not timely because Defendants had notice of the grounds alleged in the removal notice more than thirty days before the cases were removed, (2) Defendants could not satisfy the test for substantial federal question jurisdiction set forth by the United States Supreme Court, and (3) the Defendants could not satisfy the second, third, and fourth requirements of the jurisdictional test for “Federal… [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm
In their Motions to Remand, Plaintiffs argued that: (1) the removal was not timely because Defendants had notice of the grounds alleged in the removal notice more than thirty days before the cases were removed, (2) Defendants could not satisfy the test for substantial federal question jurisdiction set forth by the United States Supreme Court, and (3) the Defendants could not satisfy the second, third, and fourth requirements of the jurisdictional test for “Federal… [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:41 am
Herold states that the plaintiff was engaged in the unlicensed practice of medicine and backed up his statement with three reasons: 1) The plaintiff was prescribing supplements to the consuming public; 2) The plaintiff stated that her blood tests can held customers detect diseases before standard blood tests; and 3) The plaintiff interpreted the results of the blood tests. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:41 am
Herold states that the plaintiff was engaged in the unlicensed practice of medicine and backed up his statement with three reasons: 1) The plaintiff was prescribing supplements to the consuming public; 2) The plaintiff stated that her blood tests can held customers detect diseases before standard blood tests; and 3) The plaintiff interpreted the results of the blood tests. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 8:00 am
As Justice Stephen Breyer pointed out in his dissent, on remand, many different plaintiffs — including “lawful permanent residents, asylum seekers, refugees, students, children, and numerous others” — can now be expected to press the proclamation’s elaborate system of exemptions and waivers in an effort to test Sotomayor’s suspicion “that the Proclamation’s waiv [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:33 pm
Some of the lawyers for the men challenging the law wept openly in the gallery as Kennedy read from his opinion for the court, emphasizing that the plaintiffs “are entitled to respect for their private lives. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:12 pm
The plaintiff was Alan, whose motorcycle was struck by Elsie in 2013. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm
Adam Stone, for Plaintiff-Appellee. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 8:43 am
The plaintiffs alleged that the General Assembly “predominantly relied on race” when drawing up 12 majority African-American voting districts for the 2011 election. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
” The five men who composed the majority in yesterday’s ruling failed that test. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:55 pm
Indeed, the court explained, “[u]nlike the typical suit involving religious displays or school prayer, Plaintiffs seek to invalidate a national security directive regulating the entry of aliens abroad. [read post]
