Search for: "Wells v. Justice Court" Results 6441 - 6460 of 29,128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2024, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
The ECtHR in particular referred to the fact that the national courts relied essentially, on the statements of the two prosecution witnesses, one of whom was absent at the hearing while the identity of the other was kept secret, as well as on the conclusions of a multidisciplinary expertise team, commissioned by the investigator. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 9:18 pm
Justices of the Supreme Court of Arizona, No. 05-17063 (Nov. 15, 2007), the Ninth Circuit held that Arizona's "low bono" requirement that all attorneys serve as arbitrators for $75 per day, maximum two days, is not a taking. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 3:50 am by SHG
The story is that Associate Justice Harry Blackmun was given authorship of the 7-2 majority opinion in Roe v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 9:35 pm
On the same subject, last week the IPKat published a lively opinion piece by Swedish Advokat Mats Björkenfeldt (Hjalmar Petris Advokatbyrå HB) which suggested that the ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Communities in Case C-487/07 L'Oréal v Bellure might be contrary to Community law. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 11:44 am
  Consider the Supreme Court's first venture onto Youtube in Scott v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 10:13 am
”  Id. at 35.The court rejected the “outlier” decisions, Conte v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 5:57 am by NL
Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 6 As if to confirm that housing law is, well, complicated, there is a coda to the Supreme Court decision in Manchester City Council v Pinnock, which has led to a supplementary judgment being handed down. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 1:53 pm by Steve Gottlieb
He was joined by Justices Douglas and Frankfurter, as well as justices Reed, Murphy, Rutledge and Burton who are less well known to the general public. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 5:44 pm
But the trial court denied the motion for class certification for lack of an ascertainable class (which the Court of Appeal correctly held wasn't the case) as well as failure to establish commonality. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 5:30 pm by Don Cruse
Earlier this week, the Texas Supreme Court requested full briefing on the merits in Brenda Hatton v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 3:16 pm by FDABlog HPM
Supreme Court granted certiorari in three cases concerning generic drug preemption - PLIVA Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 11:40 am by Sabrina Serino
In a recent decision, the Honourable Justice Marrocco of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice denied the request of the Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113 and Robert Kinnear (the “Applicants”) to restrain the TTC from conducting the random drug and alcohol testing of its employees. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 11:37 am by Sabrina Serino
In a recent decision, the Honourable Justice Marrocco of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice denied the request of the Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113 and Robert Kinnear (the “Applicants”) to restrain the TTC from conducting the random drug and alcohol testing of its employees. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 4:35 pm by Mark Walsh
ShareThe justice, in his 80s, had served on the Supreme Court for well over two decades, becoming a liberal stalwart on such issues as abortion rights, affirmative action, and opposition to the death penalty. [read post]