Search for: "All Other Claimants"
Results 6461 - 6480
of 13,103
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2015, 2:32 am
The creative industries generally favour a levy based on sales of recordable media and devices (blank CDs, DVDs, iPods, tablets, laptops, mobile phones, etc), while other options include a bulk payment from public funds, or indeed no compensation at all, as was the case prior to this judgment. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 9:00 pm
The ECJ’s recent decision in Gazprom (Case C-536/13) is the latest addition to a series of judgments by the Court that have considerably reduced the remedies available to claimants who seek to enforce the negative dimension of an arbitration agreement, i.e. the other party’s obligation not to initiate court proceedings. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 1:09 pm
This article deals with the new opportunities that the revised Brussels Regulation (‘Recast’) may offer to claimants who wish to obtain a Dutch pre-judgment garnishee order against garnishees located in other Member States. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 8:56 am
At trial, the judge ruled against the claimants on all grounds and, adding insult to injury, awarded $85,005.50 in attorneys’ fees to the trustee based on a finding that the claimants had “presented absolutely no evidence” of wrongdoing. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 4:12 am
But it can be crudely explained by pointing out that IP protection aims to favour the “exploitation” of IP by its “rightful” owner over all other forms of use. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 8:26 am
Landgericht Wiesbaden and Kiel), the claimants, all holders of Greek State bonds, had initiated legal actions against the Hellenic Republic based on German civil law. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 8:16 am
There is usually no reason given other than the claimant is not disabled. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 7:17 am
Section 542.056(a) imposes other deadlines once the company receives all information required to secure proof of final loss. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:35 am
You either want to play in the sandbox, or you go to some other playground. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 6:30 am
Explore claimant on all social media and background services. [read post]
[Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz] Los Angeles v. Patel and the constitutional structure of judicial review
9 Jul 2015, 5:17 am
Otherwise, it is turtles all the way down. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 4:32 am
Any such application must:(i) clearly indicate the identity and status of the applicant;(ii) be supported by evidence setting out and justifying the grounds of the application; and(iii) be made on 10 days notice to all of the parties to the Court Order. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 10:14 am
A concern for potential claimants is whether the passage of time will impair their rights to pursue claims against Syngenta. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 2:23 pm
Other times, the reason for the denial is a simple miscommunication between the insurance company and the claimant. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 6:30 am
All state laws vary. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 12:41 am
So, all of this is interesting to comparative legal studies nerds like myself, but what is the takeaway for the American class action lawyer? [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 6:34 am
The minority held that Article 8 was engaged since REP was only one factor in the assessment – other matters such as the age of the person concerned, the use to which the material was being put and its effect on the person (including possible stigmatisation) were all relevant considerations which all contributed to render Article 8 engaged in this case. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 8:09 am
Mr Justice ArnoldThe judgmentArnold J concluded in the negative in relation to all three issues.In relation to the first point, the judge held that no contract could be considered as subsisting between the claimants and defendants. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 8:41 pm
All state laws vary. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm
The minority held that Article 8 was engaged since REP was only one factor in the assessment – other matters such as the age of the person concerned, the use to which the material was being put and its effect on the person (including possible stigmatisation) were all relevant considerations which all contributed to render Article 8 engaged in this case. [read post]
