Search for: "Antonin Scalia"
Results 6461 - 6480
of 6,603
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2018, 9:49 am
The past year also saw a change in the composition of the Supreme Court in April of 2017, with Justice Neil Gorsuch assuming the seat of Antonin Scalia after his passing in 2016. [read post]
10 May 2022, 9:02 pm
I could say, “I told you so,” but instead I’m going to lay out the reality leading to the Supreme Court draft overruling of Roe v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
Earlier this month the University of Florida (UF) announced that U.S. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
In the words of the late conservative Justice Antonin Scalia writing for the Court in a 1990 case, “much more than legal niceties are at stake” with these limits on federal court jurisdiction: they are an “essential ingredient of [the] separation and equilibration of powers. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 12:22 pm
Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit’s view of the statute, over a dissent from Justice Antonin Scalia (joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg) that echoed Gorsuch’s non-delegation concerns. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:00 pm
”Article II and the offhand meaning given to it in Blacker made a return appearance in the second—and dispositive—Supreme Court go-around (Bush II) in the Florida matter, in the concurring opinion for Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 3:16 pm
Orin S. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 9:06 pm
The Regulatory Review is pleased to highlight our top regulatory essays of 2020 authored by a select number of our many expert contributors. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 11:14 am
That is why, as Justice Antonin Scalia wrote in Trinko, “the mere possession of monopoly power, and the concomitant charging of monopoly prices … is an important element of the free market system. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 7:47 am
At its annual meeting earlier this month, the American Bar Association’s Section of Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice voted in a new cohort of leaders. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 4:04 am
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument at 10 a.m. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 3:26 pm
Bryan Garner, a textualist scholar who published a book on statutory and constitutional interpretation with the late Justice Antonin Scalia, represented Duguid. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 9:40 pm
December 19 was the due date for briefs in opposition to the petitions that had been filed last month with the California Supreme Court seeking the invalidation of Proposition 8, the ballot initiative measure that has added a different-sex definition of marriage to the California Constitution. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 1:05 pm
He would have chummed around with Justice Antonin Scalia and engaged in a “duel” of sorts about who could write the most scathing dissent. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia passed away, his untimely death setting off a potentially divisive battle between President Obama and a group of U.S. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
The Regulatory Review is pleased to highlight our top regulatory essays of 2019 authored by a select number of our many expert contributors. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 1:43 pm
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument at 11:30 a.m. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 2:13 pm
As Justice Antonin Scalia wrote in 1984, when he was a judge on a federal appeals court, “they wield those powers not as private citizens but only through the public office which they hold. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 12:36 pm
With the failed nomination of Chief Judge Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court and Gorsuch’s subsequent nomination and confirmation, the Supreme Court’s conservative majority remained intact after the passing of Justice Antonin Scalia. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm
They argued, as the Supreme Court might well have held if Antonin Scalia were still alive when the Court ruled on the case, that a president has no option but to end what they assert is a blatantly unconstitutional action.Trump then expressed support for allowing the Dreamers to stay in their country and gave Congress six months to “do it right,” that is, give Dreamers legal status via legislation rather than executive order.In a column last month, I noted the oddity of… [read post]
