Search for: "Bounds v. State"
Results 6461 - 6480
of 9,963
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2012, 6:54 pm
The Court decided that it was not bound to follow DR Horton:We decline to follow D.R. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:15 pm
However, it would appear to be insufficient on the strength of this judgement for a Court to ignore new evidence at the warrant stage and to state, for example, that the main proportionality issues had been dealt with in the course of the possession claim.Jarnea and others v Romania (31/5/12)The applicants were owners of properties which had been let to tenants under agreements concluded with the State. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:15 pm
However, it would appear to be insufficient on the strength of this judgement for a Court to ignore new evidence at the warrant stage and to state, for example, that the main proportionality issues had been dealt with in the course of the possession claim.Jarnea and others v Romania (31/5/12)The applicants were owners of properties which had been let to tenants under agreements concluded with the State. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
The district court agreed with the State's contention, but felt bound to rule otherwise in light of a case decided in 1980 by this court. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:41 am
In the courts of appeals… In State v. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 12:50 pm
In Merial Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 11:41 am
” Roadcap v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 10:13 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s recent ruling in CBX Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:39 am
Brazilian Blowout revised its position stating their products contained less than 0.2 percent formaldehyde, levels deemed safe for cosmetic use—a statement in line with the 2005 formaldehyde evaluation.) [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:39 am
Brazilian Blowout revised its position stating their products contained less than 0.2 percent formaldehyde, levels deemed safe for cosmetic use—a statement in line with the 2005 formaldehyde evaluation.) [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 3:58 am
C. v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 8:33 am
In a unanimous three-judge panel ruling in Massachusetts v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:54 am
Phil Bryant, School Prayer, Engel v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 3:16 pm
At the end of last month, this blog noted that the United States District Court for the District of Columbia would hear cross motions to dismiss / summary judgment in National Restaurant Association [NRA] v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 1:31 pm
" The previous case cited -- United States v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 7:10 am
The case is Ahlers v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 5:50 pm
The Proposition 8 case (Perry v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 3:08 am
KF 228 R64 W47 2005 What Roe v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 10:31 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States unanimously took Congress at its word last week. [read post]
27 May 2012, 7:42 am
States and communities that tried to defy orders to integrate their schools after Brown v. [read post]
