Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 6461 - 6480
of 33,829
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2020, 8:00 am
The argument about the continuance was decided by the appellate court and the trial judge based on the law in Forthman v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 3:30 am
” In an op-ed at the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Daniel Cotter looks at the recent decision in Opati v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 3:25 am
“Judge Thomas Hardiman on the history of judicial independence” [Cato Audio of last year’s Constitution Day lecture] There really needs to be an off ramp at Child Protective Services by which an investigation of a family that proves unfounded can just end instead of cycling through more and more investigation [Lenore Skenazy] Authors, journalists, photojournalists challenge AB5 in court: “California’s Anti-Freelancer Law Violates the First… [read post]
27 May 2020, 8:31 am
However, the United States Supreme Court did not adopt that analysis in Navarette v California. [read post]
27 May 2020, 8:29 am
California, 19-532Issue: Whether provisions of California law that, with certain limited exceptions, prohibit state law-enforcement officials from providing federal immigration authorities with release dates and other information about individuals subject to federal immigration enforcement, and restrict the transfer of aliens in state custody to federal immigration custody, are preempted by federal law or barred by intergovernmental immunity. [read post]
27 May 2020, 3:51 am
At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen finds Monday’s denial without comment of the cert petition in Higginson v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 6:42 pm
In California, the enforcement rate was 80%. [read post]
26 May 2020, 3:49 pm
And, as the Supreme Court in Riley v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 11:23 am
Rulings Regarding DUI Arrests Arising Out of Anonymous Tips In Navarette v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 7:00 am
Additionally, Daniels produced a pilot episode for The Moodsters as a television show in 2007.Daniels claims to have pitched The Moodsters to The Walt Disney Company on several occasions between 2005 and 2009; aside from a claim that this created an implied-in-fact contract under California law (a claim rejected by the 9th Circuit), these pitches were unsuccessful. [read post]
26 May 2020, 3:38 am
Fish and Wildlife Service v. [read post]
25 May 2020, 9:00 pm
But the First Amendment is quite clear that a state may enforce a neutral law of general applicability in Employment Div. v. [read post]
25 May 2020, 6:30 am
The other is that Texas v. [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm
The Law Society Gazette had a piece. [read post]
23 May 2020, 5:38 pm
Sterling v. [read post]
23 May 2020, 3:35 pm
To hold otherwise -- as the high courts in New York, California, Connecticut, Georgia and several other States have done -- is not only to misread Jones v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 6:02 pm
On April 6, 2020, in the matter of Vicky Ibarra v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 4:52 pm
IndiaAshutosh Dubey v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 1:21 pm
For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 4th, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
21 May 2020, 9:01 pm
California Health and Welfare Agency is applied under this test. [read post]