Search for: "Companies A, B, and C"
Results 6461 - 6480
of 12,894
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2015, 4:31 pm
C. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 12:25 pm
That assessment can lead to negotiations with drug companies about prices. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 12:24 pm
C. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 8:39 am
(b) The security screenings at issue are noncompensable postliminary activities. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 4:21 am
In respect to these latter goods, the Court undertook an examination of the absolute grounds provided by Article 7.1(b), namely lack of distinctive character. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 8:52 am
is a good idea b. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 6:13 am
(b) We are an intermediary that is required to forward this notice to you. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
There are three general rules for drafting a resignation letter: (a) keep it short but articulate; (b) be respectful and thankful for the opportunity; and (c) if you state a reason for departure, be clear but deferential. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 3:52 am
And the Court never suggested that because the “maker” of a false statement is primarily liable under subsection (b), he cannot also be liable under subsections (a) and (c). [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 3:52 am
is a good idea b. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:16 am
c) What to deliver? [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:07 am
C. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 4:05 am
The key factors for the Court in Stanner were that: (a) the employer encouraged employees to use the fitness center, (b) flexible work hours were available to enable employees to use the facility, (c) the employer distributed brochures to employees advising that physical fitness benefits both the employee and the employer, and (d) the employer’s benefits manager testified that employee participation in the fitness program reduced overall health care costs. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 4:05 am
The key factors for the Court in Stanner were that: (a) the employer encouraged employees to use the fitness center, (b) flexible work hours were available to enable employees to use the facility, (c) the employer distributed brochures to employees advising that physical fitness benefits both the employee and the employer, and (d) the employer's benefits manager testified that employee participation in the fitness program reduced overall health care costs. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
This definition is no longer used and Model Rule 3.4-18 is now triggered when either (emphasis added): (a) It is reasonable to believe the transferring lawyer has confidential information relevant to the new law firm’s matter for its client; or (b) the new law firm represents a client in a matter that is the same as or related to a matter in which the a former law firm represents or represented its client (“former client”); (ii) the interests of those clients in that… [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
At its Conference on January 9, 2015, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as state bans on same-sex marriage, proof of intent in a constructive discharge case, personal jurisdiction to award a no-contact order, and the presumption of judicial vindictiveness under North Carolina v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 9:10 am
Thus: (a) a foreclosure policy may have no disparate impact on a particular group in pre-recession 2006, but a severe one in 2009; (b) an income-requirement may have no disparate impact on Latinos in Nashville but a severe one in Denver; this may mean that two companies with identical policies have very different liability risks, or the same company may be liable in one city but not in the other (but should the cities be considered separately if it’s the same… [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
C&J’s management would lead the merged company. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 8:46 am
Case C-500/14 Ford Motor Company is a reference made by the Tribunale ordinario di Torino, Italy, for a preliminary ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on a matter that has been raised before the Italian courts on a number of occasions in recent years -- the unauthorised manufacture of "spare part" wheel trims bearing the trade marks of the original manufacturer in order to enable the purchaser to make sure that his purchase matches the appearance… [read post]
