Search for: "Franke v. Franke" Results 6461 - 6480 of 6,584
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Session 3:  The Consumer in Different Trade Mark ContextsDo the questions that we have looked at in the first two sessions vary in different trademark and adjacent contexts? [read post]
30 May 2023, 11:19 am by Patricia Hughes
Ontario (“Working Families I”) and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 11:23 am
As most readers of this blog (both of them) probably know by now - Jose Baez recently filed a Motion in Limine to Introduce Prior Bad Acts and Other Circumstantial Evidence Pertaining to Roy M. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm by Editor
Blawg Review of the Year 2009 host Kevin Thompson put together an epic presentation on Cyberlaw Central in honor of the 45th anniversary of the best-selling science fiction book of all time, Frank Herbert's Dune. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 8:19 am by admin
Moore Lincoln Boulevard, PO Box 249 Shawneetown, Illinois 62984-0249 Phone: 618/269-3140 Fax: 618/269-4324 Greene V. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
What are the lessons learned so far from the O104:H4 outbreak? [read post]
1 May 2025, 5:00 am by Beatrice Yahia
Just Security has launched a redesigned website, enhancing your experience with a modern design, improved search and navigation, and seamless access to our in-depth content. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 4:17 pm by Coral Beach
The document was apparently not sent to FDA’s deputy director for food safety concerns, Frank Yiannas. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Each year we receive thousands of whistleblower tips, and throughout the history of the program those tips have resulted in billions in monetary recovery, a significant portion of which has been returned to harmed investors, and some of which has funded whistleblower awards.[6] The Dodd-Frank whistleblower protection rule – Rule 21F-17 – is important to the program’s success. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 9:06 pm
., Amber Taylor responds to her heckler by explaining how he also could get into Harvard.David Lat at Above the Law reports on the case of Steinbuch v. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 2:19 am
Hence, the law governing the contract from which the third party rights are derived plays only a minor role (infra V): for those third party rights neither the special rule for culpa in contrahendo in Art. 12(1) - insofar as pre-contractual third party rights are concerned - nor the escape clauses in Art. 4(3) and Art. 5(2) lead to the law which governs the contract. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 12:00 am by David Pocklington
Although the Canon of 1603 initially secured a victory for ordinary bread over wafer bread in Anglican practice, wafers were reintroduced by the Victorian ritualists.[8] The question was litigated repeatedly, and wafers were famously declared illegal by the Purchas Judgment of 1871 – Elphinstone v Purchas (The Arches Court of Canterbury) [1871] UKPC – because they were not ‘the best and purest wheat bread’. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 12:48 pm by Stephen Page
I do not know why the father withheld this information from the Court and his failure to give full and frank disclosure is troubling. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 5:24 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 9:04 pm by The Regulatory Review Staff
Supreme Court’s landmark environmental decision in Michigan v. [read post]