Search for: "House v. Close"
Results 6461 - 6480
of 7,520
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2010, 12:49 pm
[Post by Venkat] United States v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 10:08 am
*Her time in the Clinton White House. [read post]
12 May 2010, 6:50 pm
In non-nomination news: The cross in the Mojave dessert that was at the center of the recent Supreme Court decision in Salazar v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 8:32 pm
In today’s case (Nybo v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 3:34 am
If you’re going to shoot up a house, killing one child and wounding another, the resulting convictions of involuntary manslaughter, felonious assault, and discharging a firearm into a habitation won’t merge, says the 10th District in State v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 11:30 pm
He recently gave evidence to the House of Lords European Union Committee on the reform of the Brussels I Regulation. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:14 pm
Storey v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 8:55 am
A closely-divided California Supreme Court has dealt employment arbitrations a potentially huge setback. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
On a closely divided Supreme Court, that is an especially important skill. [read post]
7 May 2010, 6:30 am
Slowing the Growth of Pension and Health Care CostsThe Administration again has proposed the creation of a new Tier V pension plan for new City employees, which would result in an immediate cost reduction of $200 million in the first year implemented. [read post]
6 May 2010, 5:07 am
See Georgia v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 9:04 pm
The fact is that the Home Office is seeking to rely on closed material in its defence. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:45 pm
Taufen v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:20 pm
The House of Lords threw out the Trust’s appeal. [read post]
3 May 2010, 11:00 am
United States v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:34 am
The bank files a Motion to Lift the Stay, and generally that motion is granted, because in a Chapter 7, the defenses just don't apply (there's no equity for the estate in the house, and the house isn't need for an effective reorganization, because there is no reorganization in a Chapter 7). [read post]
2 May 2010, 7:58 am
We don’t have to vote for the old guys v. the new guys. [read post]
2 May 2010, 7:24 am
[Comes close to justifying a search by its product.] [read post]
2 May 2010, 3:42 am
415/05 P Kadi and Al Barakaat International Foundation v Council and Commission [2008] ECR I? [read post]
