Search for: "In Interest of Doe"
Results 6461 - 6480
of 135,031
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2016, 4:39 am
Critics who oppose such changes say the big bills make it easier for people to keep their savings in cash, especially in countries with negative interest rates. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 1:34 pm
From Doe v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 6:00 am
Does it actually have that effect, particularly for academic authors? [read post]
19 May 2017, 6:00 am
Does it actually have that effect, particularly for academic authors? [read post]
19 May 2017, 6:00 am
Does it actually have that effect, particularly for academic authors? [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Interesting D.C. Circuit Dissent Regarding Computer Monitoring for Jan. 6 Trespasser
9 Aug 2024, 5:14 pm
With the two most important stay considerations favoring Goodwyn and with no public interest in enforcing likely unlawful speech restrictions, I would grant the motion for a stay.The post Interesting D.C. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
If the person does not have a will, or does not appoint a representative, the court will appoint one. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 1:00 am
The common reading of the ECJ's (yes) recent judgment in case C-367/15 - OTK is that the Enforcement Directive (Directive 2004/48) does not compel Member States to introduce punitive damages for infringement of intellectual property rights, but allows for national law to impose punitive damages (see, e.g., the case reports on IPKat or Kluwer Patent Blog). [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 2:58 pm
No matter how interesting they are, these services are associated with a commercial interest of a multinational which the state is directly supporting. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 12:15 pm
Section 1403 does not make such persons essential parties to the probate. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 7:11 am
And maybe Annuity B does pay slightly higher comp. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 6:22 am
If this case continues, it will be an interesting one to follow: it is likely to require consideration of the degree of protection of well-known trade marks [or is it, rather, well-known persons?] [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 2:45 pm
[1] Smith, 494 U.S. at 887; id. at 886 (“nor is it possible to limit the impact of respondents’ proposal by requiring a ‘compelling state interest’ only when the conduct prohibited is ‘central’ to the individual’s religion”).[2] 42 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 11:35 pm
Kat friend Darryl Ho discusses how the matter was recently handled under the always interesting trademark jurisprudence in Singapore. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
Surely, the framers and ratifiers of the Fourteenth Amendment did not intend it to require states to recognize same-sex marriage.Yet that observation hardly does the work that Cornyn thought it does. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 5:55 am
I read an interesting article from the Oakland Tribune about how nurses move to avoid the consequences of misconduct. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 11:30 am
Judge Rakoff also rejected the SEC's argument that it is the sole determiner of what is in the public interest. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 11:20 am
This is more significant, but it does not mean that others can import and sell infringing goods with immunity. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 9:05 am
Producing spectrographs, ovens, and centrifuges in court would serve no one's interests. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 1:53 pm
(CAFC 2009-1239, April 16, 2010), the Federal Circuit found that Mattel's failure to file a timely Section 8 declaration of use did not negate Mattel's intent to resume its use of the mark.Mattel, via its predecessor in interest Tyco, had registered the mark CRASH DUMMIES for games and playthings in 1991. [read post]
