Search for: "In re: Justice v."
Results 6461 - 6480
of 18,111
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2012, 11:42 am
Dunn (1987) and implicates a circuit split with the Ninth Circuit about whether an absent co-tenant’s prior refusal to consent to a search invalidates the consent given by a physically present co-tenant under Georgia v. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 8:52 am
But, that is NOT what Justice Roy ruled. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 5:55 am
Remember how cool it was when the Third Circuit ruled in United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:39 am
“We’re not talking about an article this justice published shortly after graduating law school, he published this 30 years after graduating from law school, when he was well-established and a seasoned lawyer. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 10:19 am
And now, following the Kennedy v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:55 pm
In Pleasant Glade Assembly of God v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 3:35 am
Oregon v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 9:35 am
May 29, 2008)(per curiam) (CPS case against FLDS sect) Justice O'Neill delivered an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, in which Justice Johnson and Justice Willett joined.[37] In re Texas DFPS (CPS), No. 08-0403 (Tex. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 10:09 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 9:36 am
The situation arising from the mounting arrears is so grave that in the `Vision Statement' presented by the Union Minister for Law and Justice to the Chief Justice of India in course of the National Consultation for strengthening the Judiciary towards reducing pendency and delays held on October 24, 2009, cases of dishonoured cheques were cited among one of the major bottlenecks in the criminal justice system. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:00 pm
Jackson v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:18 am
A victory for Justice Sotomayor Second, the case represents a victory for Justice Sotomayor, who, as I’ve noted before, dissented in the leading Court of Appeals decision on this topic, Croll v. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm
There never was any doubt that the question of whether the infringement of a single design patent by a complex, multifunctional product warrants an unapportioned disgorgement of profits would be an extraordinarily important one. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:49 am
The facts of the claims The two trials took place sequentially in February and March of this year, both before Mr Justice Warby and with the claimants sharing the same legal team. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
” Frankel granted Ali leave to re-plead the equal protection claim. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 2:54 am
R (AM) v The Director of Public Prosecutions; R (AM) v Director of Public Prosecution; and R (Nicklinson & Anor) v Ministry of Justice, heard 16 – 19 December 2013. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 1:03 pm
There is some extra wattage here this morning for arguments in one of the marquee cases of the new term, Gill v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 7:10 am
Supreme Court’s ruling last week in Luis v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 2:15 pm
Reproductive rights Barr did not distance himself from his past assertion that Roe v. [read post]
4 Dec 2006, 6:03 am
The San Jose Mercury News had an interesting editorial, which covered KSR v. [read post]
