Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 6461 - 6480
of 21,107
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2018, 11:59 am
” Who is liable? [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 6:58 am
It also found the employer liable for breach of contract. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 8:09 am
In other words, defendants will not be held jointly liable. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 7:50 am
The lawsuit alleges that the defendants breached fiduciary duties to the corporation’s shareholders, both through the alleged sexual harassment itself, and through the alleged “abject failure to act even when informed of a longstanding pattern of sexual abuse and harassment by” the former CEO. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 7:30 pm
Fault must still be proven, and in drunk driving cases it is important to look at the responsibility of both the driver and the establishment who served the alcohol, as both could be liable for accident injuries. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 2:34 pm
I'm Guessing It's Florida [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 10:56 am
A Washington appeals court recently considered whether a landowner can be liable in a Washington premises liability case if the dangerous condition is actually on someone else’s property. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 8:39 am
California, arising from California’s efforts to hold three companies liable for their role in making, selling and promoting lead paint. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 3:00 am
” The argument by defendants was that, since these plaintiffs did not pay out-of-pocket for the testing expenses, the defendants should not be liable for those expenses. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
Does the accused have the same rights as a criminal defendant? [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 5:37 am
The pleadings support a “recognizable risk of harm” to a class of persons “within a given area of danger” of defendant’s conduct, including Wanda and the class of persons similarly situated. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 3:15 am
Any be liable Great Oak v. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 8:39 am
In terms of the wrongful death claim, someone can be held liable for another’s death only if the death is caused by negligence or a will, wanton, or reckless act. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 8:25 am
The case went to trial and a jury found that the nursing home was liable for the patient’s death, awarding the patient’s estate $5.08 million. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 10:30 am
Devries, the question before the court is: “Can products-liability defendants be held liable under maritime law for injuries caused by products that they did not make, sell, or distribute? [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 5:50 am
The victim made a number of claims for negligence against the defendants, which the motion judge summarized as: The defendants ought to have known of (the assailant’s) violent behaviour given the two prior incidents and should have anticipated his conduct and not allowed him to play in the game or taken other action to prevent the assault; The defendants ought to have known of (the assailant’s) violent behaviour and ran on the field to… [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 5:50 am
The victim made a number of claims for negligence against the defendants, which the motion judge summarized as: The defendants ought to have known of (the assailant’s) violent behaviour given the two prior incidents and should have anticipated his conduct and not allowed him to play in the game or taken other action to prevent the assault; The defendants ought to have known of (the assailant’s) violent behaviour and ran on the field to… [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
The defendants' motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as asserted against each of them was denied by Supreme Court, which ruling was sustained by the Appellate Division.The Appellate Division explained that "Although an employer cannot be held vicariously liable for torts committed by an employee who is acting solely for personal motives unrelated to the furtherance of the employer's business," citing Fernandez v Rustic Inn, Inc., 60… [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
The defendants' motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as asserted against each of them was denied by Supreme Court, which ruling was sustained by the Appellate Division.The Appellate Division explained that "Although an employer cannot be held vicariously liable for torts committed by an employee who is acting solely for personal motives unrelated to the furtherance of the employer's business," citing Fernandez v Rustic Inn, Inc., 60… [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 9:47 am
The court did not decide whether the settlement agreement included the named defendants and excused them from liability but allowed the plaintiff’s lawsuit to proceed towards trial so that a jury could make that determination. [read post]
