Search for: "Mays v. Paul" Results 6461 - 6480 of 7,412
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2020, 6:43 am by Kevin Kaufman
The proposal that caught Maryland lawmakers’ eye, developed by distinguished economist Paul Romer, was not intended to tax all digital advertising, just a subset deemed exploitative. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist   Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 8:47 am
Obermeier, assistant district attorney, argued the cause, and Paul J. [read post]
26 May 2022, 5:22 am by Russell Knight
” In re Vanessa K., 2011 IL App (3d) 100545 – Ill: Appellate Court, 3rd Dist. 2011 “[A] trial court abuses its discretion if it fails to apply the proper criteria when it weighs the facts” Paul v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 6:26 am
On October 15, 2009, the Investor Protection Act of 2009 was introduced in the House of Representatives by Representative Paul E. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 10:35 am
Laeser,Contrary to your assertion, the State of Florida v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 7:18 am
Michael Pauling, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Eric A. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
Appreciate you are busy but it would be v helpful to have answers to qs about party status and existence/format of jmt. [read post]
2 May 2011, 12:00 am by 1 Crown Office Row
The trial judges in Campbell v MGN and Douglas v Hello! [read post]