Search for: "No Named Defendant"
Results 6461 - 6480
of 57,368
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2010, 6:52 am
The victim's mother has been named special administrator of the estate for the purposes of the suit. [read post]
30 May 2013, 11:02 am
Folliard’s suit also named multiple GSA Schedule contractors as defendants, and also alleged violations of the TAA. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 6:36 pm
Westchester County Probate Lawyer said it is alleged that between November 1, 2012 and November 14, 2012 the company and the named defendants utilized accounts held at the plaintiff institution and third-party accounts in a check-kiting scheme. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 6:47 am
By styling these as actions to “seize” domain names (as opposed to actions against the individual(s) performing the allegedly illegal acts), the bill avoids the inconvenience of providing the affected party an opportunity to defend his actions or to receive a final judicial determination, after a full adversary proceeding, that the website in question contains infringing material. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 1:21 pm
Div. 1999), the court interpreted the phrase “life insurance policy provided by his employer[,]” to provide security of continued support for the children without regard to where defendant was employed); see also, Meerwarth v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 1:02 pm
According to the complaints, certain of the named defendant companies in one of the complaints entered into an agreement with the named defendant company in the other complaint (whose name was Park View Law (PVL)) to provide credit repair services under PVL’s name. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 4:55 am
The court also held that the trial court-ordered redaction of names of victims and reporters of abuse was appropriate. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 3:07 am
Snap-On was not required to make separate infringement allegations as to each defendant by name. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 6:28 am
Thus, the Erasure Statute bars the government from relying on a defendant's erased police, court, or prosecution records in a later trial, prohibits courts from relying on the defendant's historical status as an arrestee to enhance his sentence for a later offense, and entitles a defendant to swear under oath that he has never been arrested.... [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:00 am
Here, the defendant’s advertisements using the domain name VCCollege.ca, displayed by search engines alongside search results for VCC, were found to create confusion and amount to passing off. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 8:17 am
Garbus, Esq., Defendant, represented by Glenn M. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 8:17 am
Garbus, Esq., Defendant, represented by Glenn M. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 4:09 pm
Along with it there was electric bills and a pool receipt that had the appellant’s name on it. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 7:42 am
The trial court granted the plaintiff’s motion, allowing for the substation of the defendant for the previously named “John Doe, M.D. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 11:32 am
Remember the libel action brought by a businessman against a former friend who created a false Facebook profile under his name? [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 3:12 am
Code, § 17204) imposes an actual reliance requirement on the named plaintiff (and only the named plaintiff) in a UCL action based upon the fraudulent prong or false advertising because “reliance is the causal mechanism of fraud. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 3:08 am
The email stated that Nurse Ogle was expected to testify as to the hospital nurses’ applicable standard of care, including the nurse individually named as a defendant. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 1:18 pm
That trial included the testimony of some of the same witnesses and included an organizational chart that named Claxton. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 9:50 pm
Sand Hill Advisors, LLC — a trademark case involving companies with the same name — the Northern District of California found that northern California is big enough for both parties. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 8:40 am
The numerous courts endorsing the maneuver interpret that language literally, allowing removal so long as no forum defendant named in a state court action has been served with process, and the requirements for diversity jurisdiction are met. [read post]
