Search for: "People v Denis" Results 6461 - 6480 of 15,965
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2016, 12:15 pm by Steven Cohen
 The defendants filed a motion to exclude, which was denied Facts – This case (Bernstein v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 4:16 am by Heather Douglas
Very few people live in the “world of words” that lawyers and judges inhabit. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 6:37 pm by Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.
During the signing, my Aunt indicated that she wanted to make some minor changes to the percentages being distributed to some of the people in her [w]ill, and some handwritten changes were made at that time. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 6:56 am by Joy Waltemath
Moreover, the court found no evidence of juror bias against Muslims sufficient to warrant a new trial (EEOC v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 3:00 am by INFORRM
However, recent Supreme Court authorities establish that the success of that defence will depend on the facts of the case, with courts ultimately balancing the public policy against the illegal conduct with the public policies which would be damaged if the claim was denied (see in particular Hounga v Allen [2014] UKSC 47 and Patel v Mirza [2016] UKSC 42, in particular at [95] – [114]). [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 3:06 pm by Michael Grossman
A pair of favored examples are Liebeck v McDonald’s Restaurants, aka “The Hot Coffee Case,” and Pearson v Chung, or “The Pants Lawsuit. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 1:20 pm by Joe Consumer
" Indeed, [V]arious problems with the device have been linked to more than a dozen deaths in recent years. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 6:50 am by Joy Waltemath
A jury would also decide if the lead employee’s comment and “constant” racial slurs created a hostile work environment (Gilliam v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
People can manage their electronic records management systems in any way they wish, good or bad. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 5:02 pm by Patricia Salkin
Dunbar v Zoning Hearing Board of City of Bethlehem, 144 A.3d 219 (PA Cmwlth 7/18/16)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Non-Conforming Uses, Uncategorized [read post]