Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 6461 - 6480
of 13,103
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2014, 7:44 pm
And United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 4:50 pm
Citing the Supreme Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am
United States, 14-29, have now been rescheduled three times. [read post]
Will the Real Evidence-Based Ebola Policy Please Stand Up? Seven Takeaways From Maine DHHS v. Hickox
6 Nov 2014, 8:44 am
The case I mentioned in my last post, Maine Department of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 1:03 pm
Commenters on a recent thread raised some excellent questions: [LawyerHouston:] If a man from a country which allows him multiple wives moves with his wives to the United States, what is his status vis-a-vis his wives in the United States? [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 7:23 pm
Therefore, a citizen whose rights to petition the government were allegedly suppressed due to government ordinances or enforcement actions, could seek remedy in other ways: including a federal section 1983 action or a state constitutional challenge. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 2:34 pm
(Most other states take the same view.) [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:30 pm
United States 14-29Issue: (1) Whether, in a prosecution for insider trading under § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 8:53 am
United States, testing the sweep — or the narrowness — of a federal law that seeks to protect evidence of crime from being destroyed. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 7:50 am
United States) and “attempted burglary” (James v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 4:41 am
, 718 P.2d 88 (U.S.Court of Appeals for the 3d Circuit 1983).Once this low threshold is met, the evidence is admissible unless provided otherwise in `the United States Constitution, a federal statute, [the Federal Rules of Evidence], or other rules prescribed by the Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 1:30 am
The Ecclesiastical Abstention Doctrine "The Free Exercise clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution precludes civil courts from delving into matters focused on `theological controversy, church discipline, ecclesiastical government, or the conformity of the members of a church to the standard of morals required of them.'" Thiagarajan v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 1:30 pm
Interpreting this provision, the Supreme Court has held that claims not submitted to the state’s court of last resort in a petition for discretionary review are deemed to be procedurally defaulted (O’Sullivan v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 8:18 am
Elven Joe SwisherUnited States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
However, the Superior Court decided in Commerce Bank/Harrisburg, N.A. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 11:07 am
For instance, last year, a three-judge panel of the 3rd Circuit held in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 6:55 am
The case, Young v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:30 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
