Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 6461 - 6480
of 13,843
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2017, 8:40 pm
Given that Starbucks has more than 13,000 stores in the United States this isn’t exactly a victory for the disabled. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm
Over the course of a long career as a civil rights and criminal defense lawyer, I have spent a great deal of time in a great many state, federal, and military prisons in the United States and her colonial outposts in Guantanamo and Iraq. [read post]
27 Jun 2009, 12:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:01 am
While prospects for significant federal spending on a new broadband program remain in limbo, Congress has allocated further funding to the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) ReConnect funding for 2020 (item below). [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
(Kremen and this case applied California law, but the result shouldn't vary much across other states.) [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 10:51 pm
There were some SEP issues in Apple v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 9:54 pm
California resident Kimberly Birbrower filed the case in state court in January 2016. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 12:48 pm
Villalba has been in the United States for 30 years -- since he came here from Mexico when he was 13 years old -- and has a wife and six kids here (two of his, three of hers, and one of theirs). [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 1:26 pm
., v. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 11:55 am
The justification for this immunity, as every student in Intro to Constitutional Law knows, is federal supremacy: John Marshall treated the Second Bank of the United States as a federal agency ("instrumentality") that had to be utterly independent of state control. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 8:00 pm
In Pokorny v. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 10:38 pm
Samsung can bring this request again in the United States, but the California-based court doesn't want to interfere with the Japanese court. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:34 pm
Meanwhile, Judge Koh has handed down an appealable final judgment in that first California Apple v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 6:29 am
The exclusive jurisdiction provision in the Alberta statute did not divest the district court of its jurisdiction, because only the Constitution and the laws of the United States can dictate what cases or controversies U.S. federal courts may hear. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 9:01 am
That case is captioned United States ex rel. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 2:23 pm
Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in Maryland v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 12:28 am
(May 12, 2010) Background: Pulte Homes, "the largest new home builder in the United States" terminated eight employees. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
Reznitskiy v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 3:46 am
United States v. [read post]
