Search for: "State v Smith"
Results 6461 - 6480
of 11,010
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2013, 7:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 4:03 am
Pineau v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 5:18 am
;United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 6:57 pm
See State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 3:22 pm
The Magistrates had refused to state a case for the consideration of the High Court. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:52 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March… [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 10:54 pm
Smith v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:39 am
Smith, 429 F.3d 706, 710 (7th Cir. 2005). [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 11:12 am
My students Tess Curet, Nathan Davis, and Michael Smith worked on the brief. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Decided on June 30, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., LINDLEY, CURRAN, MONTOUR, AND OGDEN, JJ. 329 CA 22-00889 IN THE MATTER OF ARBITRATION BETWEEN COUNTY OF ONONDAGA, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, AND and CIVIL SERVICE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, INC., ONONDAGA COUNTY LOCAL 834, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 11:07 am
Today we tee up the latest state appellate court win – David v. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 4:00 pm
v=ifX_JnBfxTY [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Decided on June 30, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., LINDLEY, CURRAN, MONTOUR, AND OGDEN, JJ. 329 CA 22-00889 IN THE MATTER OF ARBITRATION BETWEEN COUNTY OF ONONDAGA, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, AND and CIVIL SERVICE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, INC., ONONDAGA COUNTY LOCAL 834, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 11:23 am
And now Mississippi joins the growing number of courts that have said Class III medical device claims are preempted, regardless of whether the device was put to an off-label use.The case is Ledet v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:00 am
The US Supreme Court issued the much-awaited decision in Cuozzo Speed Technologies v. [read post]
7 May 2016, 7:32 am
Bruce Ackerman highlighted some key points in Captain Nathan Smith’s lawsuit against President Obama. [read post]
17 May 2022, 10:43 am
Eric Freedman, who has been keeping me informed for more than four decades, has called to my attention the fine opinion Judge Jerry Smith for a unanimous panel of the Fifth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 6:45 am
See Smith v. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 6:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 5:23 am
What is critical is that Judge Cannon crossed way over the line when she refused to follow the decision of the United States Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]