Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 6461 - 6480
of 19,224
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2016, 9:00 am
Calling Defendant's use "a reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation" of its own trademark, Plaintiff states that Defendant's use of HYPERPURE will confuse consumers as to the source of the goods.Plaintiff further contends that Defendant Legend chose the HYPERPURE mark in bad faith in an attempt to associate Defendant's products with Plaintiff's trademark and, in so doing, appropriate the goodwill that Plaintiff has built in the brand. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
Implications for Public Administration from Trinity Lutheran v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:45 pm
In Vance v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 7:41 am
Energizer, LLC v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 5:23 am
CASE NAME: Jose Cervantes v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 3:37 am
The CJEU stated that the system of the InfoSoc Directive is one of broad and preventative rights. [read post]
25 Jan 2025, 10:20 am
Teva and 10x Genomics mark remarkable moments in patent law for both the United States and the European Union. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
At Education Week’s School Law Blog, Mark Walsh reports that the court agreed to review Kisor v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 4:30 pm
Jackson and United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 10:52 am
In Kelton v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:10 am
” At The World and Everything in It, Mary Reichard discusses the oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 3:45 am
“A party that seeks sanctions for spoliation of evidence must show that the party having control over the evidence possessed an obligation to preserve it at the time of its destruction, that the evidence was destroyed with a culpable state of mind, and that the destroyed evidence was relevant to the party’s claim or defense such that the trier of fact could find that the evidence would support that claim or defense” (Pegasus Aviation I, Inc. v Varig Logistica… [read post]
20 May 2013, 1:36 pm
Scheller saw 'an impact mark on the wood of the headboard.'" [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 10:57 am
Doe v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 8:51 am
You surely recall the Hassell v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 4:03 am
United States, which asks whether the government must obtain a warrant for cell-site-location information. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 3:00 am
On 19 July 2024, the Court of Appeal handed down its judgment in Comptroller – General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks v Emotional Perception AI Limited [2024] EWCA Civ 825 following a hearing on 14-15 May 2024. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 3:39 pm
The case of United States v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 3:51 am
In Herrera v. [read post]