Search for: "United States v. David"
Results 6461 - 6480
of 6,869
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2010, 11:30 am
At People v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Larry Lessig is clearly one of the most interesting and imaginative scholars within the legal academy, and he has written a book that fully vindicates the enthusiastic blurbs it receives (from myself, as well as others). [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 4:49 pm
The statement of facts in the current case describes how, from August 2015 to December 2017, Trump—along with Cohen, Weisselberg, AMI CEO David Pecker, and others—allegedly orchestrated the “catch and kill” scheme to influence the 2016 presidential election by identifying and purchasing negative information about [Trump to] benefit [his] electoral prospects. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 2:50 pm
In United States v. [read post]
27 May 2013, 9:01 pm
In a recent ruling, in Gartner v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 2:00 pm
(In fact, the opinion references David S. [read post]
17 May 2009, 11:19 am
The case is called United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:38 pm
In making the announcement, the FTC said: “The Federal Trade Commission has stopped an Internet scheme that allegedly used bogus “free” product offers that deceived consumers in the United States and other countries and charged them for products and services they did not want or agree to purchase. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 11:06 am
These rights are named after Miranda v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 12:31 am
In his initial post on Wednesday, this Kat speculated about the apparent monopoly of the economics of IP by (admittedly excellent and informative) economists from the United States. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 1:37 pm
Now it's true Congress authorized the creation of Conrail, and it was a private corporation all of whose stock was owned by the United States. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 9:06 am
”] From Thayer v. [read post]
6 Dec 2008, 1:15 pm
The Public and the Courts , Greg Caldeira Part VIII: The Political and Policy Environment of Courts in the United States 35. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 7:20 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 3:26 am
In the end, United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2022, 11:57 am
As I told the Judges in my comment, I will focus on a few issues raised by A2IM regarding the CRB settlement process in general, the penny rate structure of the mechanical royalty system in the United States, and their proposal that mechanical licensing for physical configurations be handed over to the Mechanical Licensing Collective. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 6:14 am
The day before the Court released its 1919 opinion in United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:17 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Friday, November 8, 2019 Tags: Audits, Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Cryptocurrency, ICOs, SEC, SEC enforcement, SEC rulemaking, Securities enforcement, Securities regulation, Small firms, Transfer agents Company Hedging Policies: Observations from New Proxy Disclosures Posted by David Gordon, Dina Bernstein, and Andrew R. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 2:25 pm
On the one hand, I think the ATS needs to be sharply reined in - I agree more or less with Judge Kavanaugh's dissent in the DC Circuit panel, that the ATS properly applied is limited to conduct within the territorial United States. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 7:03 am
CFIUS concluded that the acquisition “threatens to impair the national security of the United States” and recommended divestiture. [read post]
