Search for: "Wall v State" Results 6461 - 6480 of 7,693
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2010, 8:11 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Issue summary from ScotusBlog, which also links to briefs and opinion below: Wall v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:06 am by Erin Miller
The Court also granted cert. in a new case, Wall v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:35 am by James Bickford
” In the Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin reports on several memos that Kagan wrote as a law clerk, addressing the scope of liability for state actors under the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
12 May 2010, 7:02 pm by Erin Miller
Opinion below (4th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Title: Wall v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 9:27 am by Adam Schlossman
”  Similarly, at the Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin suggests that, “based on her arguments in [Citizens United] and her writings on the subject, it isn’t clear Ms. [read post]
10 May 2010, 11:30 pm by Martin George
Richard Fentiman is Reader in Private International Law at the University of Cambridge, where he teaches the postgraduate course on International Commercial Litigation. [read post]
10 May 2010, 6:05 am by SOIssues
Due to political, legal and social concerns, the push to give Family Court judges a say in the matter has run into a wall of opposition. [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:41 pm by Stephen Page
The legal framework[21] The starting point in considering any matter under the Domestic and Family Violence Protection Act 1999 is the report of the Queensland Domestic Violence Taskforce “Beyond these Walls” (1988). [read post]
7 May 2010, 1:15 pm by Christina D. Frangiosa
This confirmation is particularly interesting because Judge Chin currently presides over the Google Book Settlement case (Author's Guild v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:02 am by Erin Miller
ACSblog highlights a recent American Constitution Society issue brief on state laws that bar people with criminal records from voting, in light of the Court’s recent call for the views of the Solicitor General in Simmons v. [read post]