Search for: "Wells v. Place"
Results 6461 - 6480
of 31,635
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2020, 1:01 am
The case of United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 12:54 am
The court considered a number of authorities in this regard, including X and Y v The Netherlands (App no 8978/80) and KU v Finland (App no 2872/02), in which the Strasbourg court had indicated that ECHR, art 8 placed a positive obligation on states to put in place effective deterrence measures against activities which may pose a threat to fundamental values and essential aspects of the private lives of individuals, particularly children and other vulnerable… [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 3:00 pm
And, naturally, the market has responded, increasing the supply of standard medical-grade face masks, as well as “designer” face coverings. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 3:00 pm
For example, in the 2015 case Harris v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 2:36 pm
"] From Friday's decision in Doe v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 2:05 pm
So, and I do think that helps focus my preparation on the right kinds of questions and the right kinds of concerns and shoring up, you know, our position in important places to be more ready. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:37 pm
" See State v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:08 pm
The panel stated that while Naquin’s workplace was subject to the “vicissitudes of a navigable waterway,” Sanchez’s work place was stable, flat, and well above the water. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:08 pm
The panel stated that while Naquin’s workplace was subject to the “vicissitudes of a navigable waterway,” Sanchez’s work place was stable, flat, and well above the water. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:08 pm
The panel stated that while Naquin’s workplace was subject to the “vicissitudes of a navigable waterway,” Sanchez’s work place was stable, flat, and well above the water. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:08 pm
The panel stated that while Naquin’s workplace was subject to the “vicissitudes of a navigable waterway,” Sanchez’s work place was stable, flat, and well above the water. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 12:44 pm
If you have not yet read United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 8:51 am
Interestingly, the EUIPO argued that even if the GC “had declared the arguments relating to the weak distinctive character of the earlier mark admissible and well founded, that circumstance would not have affected the conclusion reached in the judgment under appeal regarding the likelihood of confusion”, citing case law that had not precluded a likelihood of confusion where the distinctive character of the earlier mark was weak (the same case law that created the TMD in the… [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 10:28 pm
The drainage tile ran underneath the downhill neighbor’s adjoining land as well. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 7:21 pm
Jordan House Ltd., which evaluated a frequent and well-known patron of a hotel who became intoxicated there contrary to liquor licensing legislation. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 10:15 am
Wisconsin, the “Dairy State,” is particularly well-known for anti-margarine regulations–when I lived there, restaurants could put butter on the table but customers must request margarine (I believe that law is still in place). [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 12:40 pm
BC v. [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 8:21 am
Funding link for donations to legal fees is here: https://paypal.me/pools/c/8orbLzpxbY Matorin v. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 2:47 pm
The battle began well before the #MeToo movement. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 12:30 pm
Way back in 1983, in Bearden v. [read post]
