Search for: "mark"
Results 6461 - 6480
of 135,985
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2020, 5:53 am
Wellington).The Marks: The word HONEYCOMB dominates both marks, but "honeycomb" may have a different connotation in each. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 3:50 am
" The law is clear that only the owner of the mark may file a use-based application for registration; if the entity filing the application is not the owner of the mark as of the filing date, the application is void ab initio. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
" Moreover, in a design plus word mark, the words are normally given greater weight.Here, both marks begin with "CUTLERYAND," and the Board noted consumers are most likely to remember the first part of a mark. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 3:35 am
" The panel majority found the marks confusingly similar to the registered mark BATMAN, deemed famous for comic books and movies. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 2:52 am
The Board noted that Applicant's standard character mark might be used in any font, size, style or color, but "even if applicant’s mark were displayed in a style of lettering highly similar to that of registrant’s mark, the two marks would still not be visually similar." [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 8:33 am
(That's a monopoly on the word as a mark.) [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 3:12 am
Well, the goods overlap, but what about the marks? [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 4:37 am
It has used TINKER BELL as a trademark for dolls since 2007 and registered the mark in 2009 without a Section 2(f) acquired distinctiveness claim.Appellant United challenged the Board's findings on the strength of Disney's mark and the similarity of the involved marks. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 3:10 am
The drawing of the mark was found to not be a substantially exact representation of the mark as depicted in the original specimen, and both specimens failed to show the applied-for mark in use for the identified goods. [read post]
18 May 2018, 4:03 am
"The Marks: Because of the strong visual resemblance between the marks, the Board found the commercial impressions of the marks to be "fairly similar," and the marks as in their entireties to be "similar. [read post]
5 May 2022, 4:25 am
Affirming the district court's entry of summary judgment, the court agreed that the manner in which the marks are used weighed against a finding of likely confusion, noting that Lodestar's mark appeared on the back of the bottle "below a considerable amount of writing," and that both parties used the involved marks as tag lines subordinate to their house marks. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 3:34 am
Even if consumers notice the "O" in respondent's mark, they will see HOPNOTIC as a variation of the HPNOTIQ mark that suggests a connection between "hops" and beer.The marks are also similar in pronunciation. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 3:33 am
The USPTO refused registration of the mark S-LON for "yarns and threads for use in making beaded jewelry," finding the mark likely to cause confusion with the registered mark C-LON for "threads made of nylon. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 2:17 pm
ECTA, the European Communities Trade Mark Association, appears to have broken ranks with the trade mark owners' organisations MARQUES and INTA over twin issues of (i) overcharging of applicants for Community trade marks and (ii) subsidising national trade mark granting authorities out of fees paid by applicants for Community trade marks. [read post]
9 May 2025, 7:14 am
Was it Properly Marked? [read post]
13 Oct 2006, 4:21 pm
Registrar of Trade-marks, the Federal Court refused to set aside the Registrar of Trade-marks' refusal to register the trade-mark COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 10:03 am
Applicant maintained that the marks differ in appearance, sound, and meaning. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 6:00 am
The Board granted Merchant & Gould's petition for cancellation of a registration for the mark MG-IP, finding the mark likely to cause confusion petitioner's previously-used mark M&G, both for legal services. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 3:49 am
The Board, however, observed that its decision affects only the right to register the subject mark and does not impede their right to use the mark. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 4:27 am
The action actually concerned four registered trade marks -- two Community trade marks and two UK marks -- as well as an allegation of passing off. [read post]
