Search for: "ACT Business LLC"
Results 6481 - 6500
of 10,596
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2014, 8:00 am
See Strukmyer, LLC v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 11:02 am
Devil’s Advocate, LLC v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 4:50 am
Here’s what I read this week: Discrimination Santa Sued for Disability Discrimination Due to Reindeer Harassment — via Bolek Besser Glesius, LLC Ebola discrimination in your workplace, what the Department of Justice wants you to know. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:17 am
Employers should employ a holistic approach to the protection of their trade secrets and confidential information, whether or not Massachusetts bans non-compete restrictions altogether or adopts the Uniform Trade Secrets Act. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 12:34 am
Time to check your crystal ball to see what it portends for the legal industry in 2015 – or you can just head over to the Business of Law Blog to see what others think. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 3:36 pm
Directors and officers of corporations and managers and members of limited liability companies (LLCs) should be wary of such solicitations. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 10:35 am
Soul Train Holdings LLC, 2014 WL 7008952, No. 14 Civ. 36 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 8:59 am
With its recent decision in Orca Communications Unlimited, LLC v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 3:38 pm
., LLC v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 3:38 pm
., LLC v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 8:09 am
appeared first on In the Red - The Business Bankruptcy Blog. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:27 am
Plaintiffs (a purported “class of one”) contended that Defendants enforced Town land use laws in a manner that penalized Plaintiffs and harmed their financial interests, while according more lenient treatment to a competing entertainment and concert-hosting business, G & B Real Property LLC (“G & B”). [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:27 am
Plaintiffs (a purported “class of one”) contended that Defendants enforced Town land use laws in a manner that penalized Plaintiffs and harmed their financial interests, while according more lenient treatment to a competing entertainment and concert-hosting business, G & B Real Property LLC (“G & B”). [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:44 pm
The Advisers Act was amended as part of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act adopted in 2010. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 8:30 am
This essentially means that the assets of the business alone are available to any creditors of the business, whether as a result of contract or of tort. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 3:24 am
Subscription agreements are often used for closely held business entities whose ownership includes numerous passive investors, certain types of professional practices, and in other special circumstances. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:14 pm
On December 3, 2014, the Federal Trade Commission announced two administrative settlements with a medical Billing Provider, PaymentsMD, LLC, and its former CEO, Michael Hughes, for allegedly misleading thousands of consumers who signed up for an online billing portal by failing to adequately disclose that the company would seek detailed medical information from pharmacies, medical labs, and insurance companies. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 10:04 am
The franchises at issue were all within New York and the employee asserted that McDonald’s was liable for the acts of these franchisees because it exercised sufficient control over their daily management and operations, including the regulation of employment practices through business manuals and policies. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
The action against College Education Services LLC and its individual owners, which was filed jointly by the CFPB and the Florida Attorney General in a Florida federal district court, alleged that the company violated the Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR), the Consumer Financial Protection Act (CFPA) prohibition of unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices and the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 1:00 am
Arab Bank, PLC, marked the first time that a financial institution has been brought to trial under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) and has implications for how financial institutions as well as other corporations will conduct business in the future, reinforcing a zero tolerance policy for fostering terrorist activity.The jury that determined liability, but did not hear plaintiffs' stories, only heard facts regarding the Bank's responsibility for financing Hamas, including… [read post]
