Search for: "B William" Results 6481 - 6500 of 7,363
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2008, 7:20 am
The note said (verbatim):Judge Gonzales, I disagree with my fellow jurers of (a) entrapment, (b) conspiracy of possession to distribution of drugs, concerning David Williams, Steele, & Brown. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:45 pm
Here's the line from the article that got my attention (emphasis mine): The law firms that survive during these trying economic times are the ones that are willing to discount rates, said panelists, which included Bruce MacEwen, a New York-based law firm consultant; Sheryl Willert of Williams Kastner in Seattle; Patricia Diaz Dennis, senior vice president and assistant general counsel of AT&T; and Raymond Williams of DLA Piper's Philadelphia office. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 9:48 pm
Making Light, McCain Gives Up on New Hampshire gives us this photo, Kos, Brian Williams: McCain Campaign Spread ‘B’ Hoax To Reporters David Neiwert, ‘B’-grade hoax reveals Republicans’ inner race-baiter Political Animal, What did the McCain campaign push and when did it push it? [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 3:57 pm
    Washington attorney Theodore B. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 5:00 pm
Johnson 184,500 90,965 63,654 14,052 353,171 William M. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Schales, No. 07-10288 A child pornography case is remanded to the district court with order to vacate either the conviction for receiving child pornography in violations of 18 U.S.C. section 2252(a)(2), or the conviction for possessing child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 2252(a)(4)(B), due to violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause where: 1) possession of child pornography is a lesser included offense within receipt of child pornography; and 2) convictions on the two counts… [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 5:20 pm
Saul Margules (collectively referred to as "defendants") under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 8:20 pm
I, of course, would recommend that it follow the approach set forth in my forthcoming William & Mary Law Review article, Dr. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:46 pm
P. 23(b)(2) requirements for certification; and 4) remand was necessary for consideration of whether the proposed damages class met the Rule 23(b)(3) requirements. [read post]