Search for: "BROWN v. BROWN" Results 6481 - 6500 of 14,313
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The right to a disciplinary hearing may survive the individual’s resignation or retirement from the position Hughes v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 7:41 am by Jon L. Gelman
Browning Ferris Indus., Inc., 103 N.J. 177, 183, 510 A.2d 1152 (1986) (citing Morris v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 4:10 am
Ed. 2d 302), inasmuch as Room 210 was secured while officers waited for the crime scene unit, which arrived within several hours and then seized the ripped currency, ripped sheet, and blood evidence that was in plain view (see People v George, supra; see also People v Brown, 96 N.Y.2d 80, 89, 749 N.E.2d 170, 725 N.Y.S.2d 601). [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 4:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 . was effectively compelled by the mistakes of [defendant] counsel” (Bernstein v Oppenheim & Co., 160 AD2d 428, 430 [1st Dept 1990]) or the result of fraud or coercion (see Beattie v Brown & Wood, 243 AD2d 395 [1st Dept 1997]). [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 1:20 pm by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Retirement Trust v Brown, Raysman, Millstein, Felder & Steiner, 96 NY2d 300, 303). [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 8:31 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
The bench throughout is Lords Hope, Brown, Mance, Dyson and Sumption. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 3:21 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, the plaintiff failed to offer a reasonable justification for failing to present this affirmation in opposition [*2]to the defendant's original motion (see CPLR 2221[e][3]; Brown Bark I, L.P. v Imperial Dev. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 2:19 pm by Rosalind English
What amounts to “positive action” will no doubt depend upon the circumstances of a particular case and, in some circumstances, the state may be required to take positive steps to prevent ill-treatment at the hands of others (see, e.g., R (Bagdanavicius) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] UKHL 38 at [24] per Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood, E v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2008] UKHL 66 at [44] per Lord Carswell, and R (B)… [read post]