Search for: "English v. English"
Results 6481 - 6500
of 11,203
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2009, 11:30 am
Unni v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 5:40 am
Jensen: The Law Governing the Arbitration Agreement: A Comparative Analysis of the United Kingdom Supreme Court’s Decision in Enka v Chubb On 9 October 2020 the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom rendered its much-anticipated decision in Enka Insaat Ve Sanayi A.S. v OOO Insurance Company Chubb (Enka v Chubb). [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 11:26 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 5:49 am
English judges have become too willing to see the anti-suit injunction, once a rare beast, as a routine part of the judicial arsenal. [read post]
10 May 2014, 9:25 am
Sincerely, Robert V. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
The English approach is to define certain legal activities as being “reserved” (subject to exemptions) with the remaining legal activities being “unreserved”. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:01 am
And all of them bilingual English and Chinese. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 7:11 pm
It is noteworthy that in March 2022, Shanghai Maritime Court ruled to recognize and enforce an English judgment in Spar Shipping v Grand China Logistics (2018) Hu 72 Xie Wai Ren No.1, marking the first time that an English monetary judgment has been enforced in China based on reciprocity. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 4:26 pm
It’s difficult to comment without a full investigation and a copy of the Swedish study in English. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:09 pm
As the Court explained in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 4:10 am
This follows his earlier judgment in Teva v Novartis ([2022] EWHC 2847 (Pat)). [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 8:42 am
R. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 11:58 pm
See Rosalind English’s post about the decision. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 8:23 am
The Supreme Court has held that Part I of the Indian Act is excluded in cases (ii), (iii) (Dosco v Doozan; Hardy Oil) and (perhaps) (iv) (Videocon v Union of India); and that it is not excluded in case (i) (Indtel Technical Services; Citation Infowares v Equinox). [read post]
20 May 2012, 6:09 am
Recent cases concerning defence powers have been based, not on the ambit of the ”forbidden area” ( Marchiori v Environment Agency [2002]), but on the notion that the government’s discretion in such matters is much wider (CND v Prime Minister [2002]; or that courts should be reticent (rather than constitutionally forbidden) to intervene (R v Jones [2006]). [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 8:52 am
I substituted Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 4:23 am
See also Rosalind English’s post In the courts City of London v Samede [2012] EWHC 34 (QB). [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 4:49 am
Valley Forge Historical Society v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 10:51 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:27 am
KHAN v. [read post]
