Search for: "Gaines v. State" Results 6481 - 6500 of 9,739
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2008, 12:35 am
  In an appeal that will require five Justices to resolve, even on the issue of accepting review, the district filed Northwest Austin Municipal District Number One v. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 6:37 pm by Lyle Denniston
This effort, he told a dinner gathering of the Human Rights Campaign, a gay rights advocacy group, is intended “to give real meaning” to the Supreme Court’s decision last June in United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 1:41 pm by Michael
The jurisdiction “A court has personal jurisdiction over defendant in his suit under this chapter if: The defendant resides in the state The claimant who is depicted in intimate visual material resides in this state The intimate visual material is stored on a server that is located in this state; or Intimate visual material is available for view in this state. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 11:17 pm by Molly Adams
Information regarding any capital gains tax which is due upon the disposal of any assets. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 4:00 am by Dan Filler
The Competition attracts teams from law schools across the United States and Canada. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 9:05 am by Tim Zinnecker
v=DO4J_PC1b5M and learn more at https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/20/travel/detroit-michigan-downtown.html. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 6:06 am by centerforartlaw
In the complaint, OMA argues that De Groft was almost single-handedly running this scheme for his own gain at OMA’s expense. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm by Rachel Rebouche
Supreme Court handed down its decision in June Medical Services v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 4:16 am by Marie Louise
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton (Patents Post-Grant) District Court C D California: TP tops Despatch as court rules up is not down: Despatch Industries v TP Solar (Green Patent Blog)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Late Allergan Reduction – “The allergans” requires all allergans not just one or more: Late Allergen Reduction v Dynarex (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Mondis – Public statements by foreign… [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 1:59 pm by Michelle Yeary
  Plaintiff argued that the pump “is separate and apart from the insulin infusion system and did not gain approval through the PMA process. [read post]