Search for: "Good v. Good" Results 6481 - 6500 of 76,266
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2022, 8:32 am by Unknown
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2022.html Yurok Tribe v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 7:15 am by David Hemming (Bristows)
Continuing, he also noted that in Warner-Lambert Co LLC v Generics (UK) Ltd (t/a Mylan) [2018] UKSC 56, the Supreme Court “upheld the distinction drawn between amendments to delete claims that have been held to be invalid and amendments designed to make good a claim not thus far advanced in the amended form”, in other words confirming that what the Court of Appeal had said in IPCom and Nikken was correct. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 5:32 am by Eugene Volokh
"While preventing embarrassment may be a factor satisfying the 'good cause' standard, an applicant for a protective order whose chief concern is embarrassment must demonstrate that the embarrassment will be particularly serious. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 4:11 am by Nedim Malovic
In the board’s view, the colour scheme would not be perceived as a purely aesthetic ‘decoration’ of the claimed goods: instead, due to its size and predominance, it would be eye-catching and striking. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 2:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
[An interesting threats case, from the Louisiana Court of Appeal] From Terrell v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 11:10 am by Michael Ehline
After congratulating Breyer for nearly three decades of serving in the nation’s highest court, he indicated attributes such as intelligence, rigor, and good faith. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 9:01 am by Keith E. Whittington
Of course, the university might choose not to apply those principles in a consistent manner and instead regard its report as a restricted ticket good for this day and train only. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 4:55 am by Michael C. Dorf
He writes: Suppose that in 1924 this Court had expressly reaffirmed Plessy v. [read post]