Search for: "Grant v. People" Results 6481 - 6500 of 16,989
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2017, 8:00 am by Orin Kerr
Granted, there is some precedent in some district courts suggesting a looser standard for consent. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 7:08 am by Joy Waltemath
Granting summary judgment against his breach of contract claims, a federal district court in Pennsylvania found the company’s rules safeguarding its assets were not put in place for the benefit of employees and its detailed information security policies existed to protect it from harm, not to inure to the employees’ benefit (Enslin v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 2:11 pm
  A provision added by Proposition 59 states:  “The people have the right of access to information concerning the conduct of the people’s business, and, therefore, . [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:24 am
Abarca (2016) 2 Cal.App.5th 475, 481–482, review granted October 19, 2016, S237106 [same]; People v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
The second new grant is in Ayestas v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 10:14 am by David Kimball-Stanley
If the American people stand for freedom, they should watch these tapes. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Canada The Supreme Court of Canada has granted permission to appeal in the case of Goldhar v. haaretz.com, which will address key issues of jurisdiction in online defamation cases. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:26 am by INFORRM
There are several other reasons why the decision of the House of Lords in Reynolds v Times Newspapers was aberrant. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 12:45 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Some are more bright line than others; Google v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 9:27 am by Jordan Brunner
A grant of immunity would require approval from two-thirds of the congressional committee requesting testimony or a majority vote in the full House or Senate, as well as the approval of a district court judge. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 9:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
One example: Maker’s Mark case v. [read post]