Search for: "MATTER OF T F" Results 6481 - 6500 of 13,727
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am by Marty Lederman
It's been almost a year since my last series of posts on the fallout from Hobby Lobby--in particular, on the challenges by nonprofit organizations to the government's augmented religious accommodation. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
President Harry Truman The 1963 assassination of President John F. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 2:42 pm by admin
” Again, most of these facts were submitted by the parties under seal so we don’t know with any specificity what the Court found most influential. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 2:42 pm by admin
” Again, most of these facts were submitted by the parties under seal so we don’t know with any specificity what the Court found most influential. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 2:42 pm by admin
” Again, most of these facts were submitted by the parties under seal so we don’t know with any specificity what the Court found most influential. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 6:31 am
Nevertheless, he seems to have got his answer in Case T-621/14 Infocit - Prestação de Serviços, Comércio Geral e Indústria, Lda v OHIM and, although the matter is by no means ‘hot news’ at this point, it still merits some discussion.Infocit lodged an application for a Community trade mark for the word “DINKOOL” in respect of several goods in classes 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 12, 16, 20 and 21. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 5:28 am
The State's Attorney's Office faxed the order to `AT&T/Cingular Wireless. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 11:30 am
” … [They] are “those personally abusive epithets which, when addressed to the ordinary citizen, are, as a matter of common knowledge, inherently likely to provoke violent reaction. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 11:54 am by Kevin
However this is a non-devolved matter. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 10:45 am by Ron Coleman
Note that the words after “by” have been ellipsed by me, because . . . contrary to the court’s suggestion, they don’t matter. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 5:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  In addition, Hollander couldn’t show any injury. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 7:00 am by Benjamin Wittes
For one thing, he stated very clearly to the Judiciary Committee—and with evident reluctance—that some of the encryption the bureau is now facing is beyond its capacity to crack: [I]f we intercept data in motion between two encrypted devices or across an encrypted mobile messaging app and it's strongly encrypted, we can't break it. [read post]