Search for: "People v Word"
Results 6481 - 6500
of 17,914
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2017, 8:21 am
Had they been required to take an oath, not a one of them would have said a word. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 7:09 pm
Was I still in Canada, or had someone whisked me away to North Korea, where people must say what officials want to hear? [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 4:05 pm
On 17 October 2017, Brown v Bower & anr there will be a half day, trial of preliminary issue as to meaning and defamatory tendency (see [2017] EMLR 24) On the same day there will be a trial of a preliminary issue in Butt v Home Office as to whether the words complained of are fact or comment. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 11:20 am
From a practical standpoint beyond the law, some people feel it important to pre-emptively assault another or to disproportionately pummel an assailant, for such reasons as getting the word out not to mess with the person. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 5:01 am
The decision, R. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
In a famous example, an agent of Columbia Pictures sent takedown notices for numerous Vimeo uploads—including the short film that originally inspired Columbia’s Pixels movie—simply for having the word “pixels” in their names.[4] The rights of wrongly accused Internet users, and of those who would read or watch their work, suffer as a result. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 9:07 am
At the time of the lawsuit McGann v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:18 am
But as the reflected in the Third Circuit’s decision in McGann v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:07 pm
Novotny v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:07 pm
Novotny v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:09 am
Supreme Court to strike down a new Mississippi law that lets government workers and business people cite their own religious objections to refuse services to LGBT people. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
In Florida v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 7:36 am
See State v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 5:52 am
Co. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
This summer, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in the Google Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:58 am
… 18 Long v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
In 1972, the Court went further and found in Eisenstadt v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 4:09 pm
As identified in People v. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 5:49 pm
Hearing Impaired Juror Requests an Accommodation Late The Court of Appeal, Third District of California rendered an opinion in People v. [read post]
