Search for: "People v. House"
Results 6481 - 6500
of 12,872
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2015, 2:18 pm
In today’s case (Williams v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 12:33 pm
The simple fact is that most people will obey the law and some, at least, will be converted by it.Here's one from Police Department of the City of Chicago v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 6:59 am
The judge then began his analysis of Vafeades’ motion to suppress, explaining that theFourth Amendment ensures `[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures’ and that `no [w]arrants shall issue but upon probable cause . . . and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 6:30 am
The government’s position rests on the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Walker v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 11:10 pm
Two people laughed, Jeremy scowled. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 3:20 pm
Ken White reports today on the opinion in United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 1:39 pm
On April 21, 1896, the Court of Appeals of New York in People v Barberi, 149 N.Y. 256 (available on Westlaw Next at this link) ruled that the judgment of conviction should be reversed and a new trial granted. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 12:27 pm
Ken White reports today on the opinion in United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 9:35 am
The Supreme Court’s decision now allows local authorities to apply reasonable residency restrictions as demanded by the particulars of each case. [1] People v. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 6:41 am
Wells also linked to the United States’ en banc petition in United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 1:28 pm
Lalani v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 12:38 pm
Politico describes the retired general’s dissatisfaction over White House underfunding and micromanaging of war efforts. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 10:07 pm
Supreme Court in the upcoming term is Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 11:44 am
In Defend Our Waterfront v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:27 am
Brown v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:27 am
Brown v. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:36 am
A room at the George V in Paris is going to cost you big time, but then, you knew that going in and chose to run up such a tab. [read post]
19 Sep 2015, 5:15 am
Ben pointed out that the White House's reluctance to consider legislation dealing with encryption on communication devices indicates a victory for industry. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am
Hearing around 20 substantive appeals a year the Court’s work can be compared with the corresponding number of 60 in both the House of Lords (now Supreme Court) and the High Court of Australia. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 11:13 pm
There may well be a problem in inner city areas, given benefit caps v. market rents and shortage of accommodation, but big cities are only a small part of Britain. [read post]
