Search for: "STATE v FIELD" Results 6481 - 6500 of 12,942
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2015, 8:22 am by Joy Waltemath
The employee worked for an armored courier company, which operated a fleet of armored vehicles across several states in the Mid-Atlantic region. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 7:35 am
Taken by itself and out of context, the question "Is it acceptable that the European Union abandons its powers in favour of the Member States? [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 4:00 am by John Gregory
The US Federal Rules of Evidence state expressly that authentication involved providing the basis on which the finder of fact could conclude that a document was what it purported to be. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 1:51 am
The same blog carries a note by JIPLP editorial board member Charles Macedo, with three of his colleagues, on "trade mark tacking" and the recent US Supreme Court ruling in Hana v Hana. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 1:18 pm
The Currin Court upheld the private delegation by saying it was no greater than the delegation to the President upheld in Field v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:29 am by SHG
The incident, Fitzgerald says, is based on a 2008 homicide case, State of Alabama v. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 8:23 pm
I am not doing any “backpedaling” from NFIB, because its anti-coercion principles, like those of previous Supreme Court precedents in this field, apply only to federal grants to state government, not to grants to private individuals. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 3:46 pm by Lyle Denniston
  That was the summary ruling in Baker v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 2:33 pm
Outros autores a desenvolveram, mas o fato é que no século XXI a formulação teórica de Von Bertalanffy, atende a várias ciências. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:07 pm
Presently EPA and the state do not treat drainage districts as point sources, but instead consider them to be an exempt nonpoint source - carrying water running off farm fields after storms. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 10:22 am by Kirk Jenkins
” Nor did the Arizona Supreme Court’s decision in Fields v. [read post]