Search for: "State v Cooper"
Results 6481 - 6500
of 8,568
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2011, 11:11 pm
Ward's issues with the contract were negated by her conduct in cooperating with it. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 9:38 am
TweetIn Feldman v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 8:32 am
The Supreme Court opinion in Skinner v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:59 am
(Docket Report) False marking lawsuits are real problem for business and make little sense when applied to expired patents (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) USPTO symposium March 11 to bring together women inventors and entrepreneurs (Director’s Forum) Deciding whether to stay a case pending reexamination (Reexamination Alert) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: ABB v Cooper – The broad scope of declaratory judgment jurisdiction (Patently-O) District Court Ohio rules false… [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 10:03 pm
Meaux v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 10:20 am
If you have read Part I, you are familiar with the Court of Chancery's decision in TR Investors LLC v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 2:33 am
The motorcycle and Mini Cooper both caught fire. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 7:04 am
Here's a question for readers: How far do you get through the Tennessee Court of Appeals' opinion in State v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 11:52 am
By Jason Rantanen ABB Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:31 am
This comes from the Tennessee Court of Appeals in State v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:17 am
Jacobson v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:11 am
R. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 2:14 am
In particular the texts of the Trade Mark Directive and the Community Trade Mark Regulation should be rewritten to match what the Court of Justice said they actually meant in eg Case C-292/00 Davidoff v Gofkid [we've all got used to the law now, so it would be a shame to spoil things by changing it -- but hasn't the ECJ's ruling in Davidoff done quite a bit to clutter the register by extending trade mark protection way past that which the law explicitly provided?] [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 9:01 pm
See Fayed v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 5:26 pm
The comments were submitted at the SEC’s invitation as the Commission prepares a report mandated by Section 929Y of Dodd-Frank to address whether the rule announced by the Supreme Court in Morrison v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:05 pm
Cooper, 2011 ONCA 150, where it held that the Courts of Ontario had jurisdiction against the re [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 11:27 am
The alleged harassment and retaliation began in 2008, when Hastings was Chairman of the United States Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:35 am
” (U.S. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:02 am
by Peggy McGuinness Almost three years have passed since the Supreme Court's decision in Medellin v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:22 am
Cooper (2011 ONCA 150) the Court of Appeal for Ontario held that the Ontario courts had jurisdiction to try a defamation claim brought by an Ontario based academic against the “Slavic Review”, an academic journal published in the United States, of which 81 copies were distributed in Ontario. [read post]
