Search for: "State v. A. T. D." Results 6481 - 6500 of 23,982
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2018, 9:04 am by Eugene Volokh
The "questionable" "editing choices," the court said, weren't sufficiently injurious to reputation to qualify as libelous (whether or not they conveyed a false message).From yesterday's Fourth Circuit decision in Virginia Citizens Defense League v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 1:52 pm
  So there's a reason why today's opinion unanimously finds in favor of the State. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 4:54 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which involves an exception to the double jeopardy clause that allows a defendant to be prosecuted for the same crime in both federal and state court, for state-court prosecutions of potential recipients of presidential pardons; in an accompanying essay on his eponymous blog, he discusses the relation between originalism and stare decisis as invoked by Justice Brett Kavanaugh during the Gamble  In an op-ed for The New York… [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 7:43 am by John Elwood
Because the next conference isn’t until January 4, 2019, we won’t know for weeks which cases were relisted after the December 7 conference. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Au Canada, l’évolution récente du contrôle judiciaire a été marquée par une déférence variable, l’application de critères déroutants et la qualification nouvelle de vieux problèmes, sans qu’une solution n’offre de véritables repères aux parties, à leurs avocats, aux décideurs administratifs ou aux cours de justice saisies de… [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
Wilkie, in which the justices have been asked to overrule Auer v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 6:10 am by Michael Geist
In fact, the committee has received copious data on the state of educational copying. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
The justices also issued one opinion yesterday: In United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 7:19 am by Robert Liles
One reason for this, is that:“[O]nce someone has billed for examining or x-raying a patient, Medicaid generally won’t reimburse another dentist for doing these services for at least another six months . . . [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” Tony Mauro observes at The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required) that “[i]t is rare for justices to compliment the lawyers before them for the quality of their briefs, but Justice Stephen Breyer did just that during oral argument” last week in patent case Helsinn Healthcare v. [read post]