Search for: "State v. Character" Results 6481 - 6500 of 7,506
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2010, 4:35 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Similar to its federal counterpart, Mississippi Rule of Evidence 609(a)(1) provides that For the purpose of attacking the character for truthfulness of a witness, (1) evidence that (A) a nonparty witness has been convicted of a crime shall be admitted... [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
– Adrian Jacobs estate claim his character Willy the Wizard has been into Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (IP Whiteboard)   United States US General US business calls for IP enforcement ‘surge’, seeks new legislation this year (IP Watch) PK and EFF joint submission: Special 301 review should respect copyright balance and increase transparency (Public Knowledge) (Michael Geist) (Public Knowledge)   US Patents Appealing BPAI rejections in ex parte… [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
– Adrian Jacobs estate claim his character Willy the Wizard has been into Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (IP Whiteboard)   United States US General US business calls for IP enforcement ‘surge’, seeks new legislation this year (IP Watch) PK and EFF joint submission: Special 301 review should respect copyright balance and increase transparency (Public Knowledge) (Michael Geist) (Public Knowledge)   US Patents Appealing BPAI rejections in ex parte… [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 9:05 am by Lawrence Solum
Before I engage substantively with Coan’s claims, let me state clearly how much I admire this piece. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 2:55 am
: Hewlett-Packard Co. v Acceleron, LLC (Florida Patent Lawyer Blog) (PatLit) District Court E D Texas: Device component may ‘receive’ data from itself: Datatreasury Corporation v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 2:55 am
: Hewlett-Packard Co. v Acceleron, LLC (Florida Patent Lawyer Blog) (PatLit) District Court E D Texas: Device component may ‘receive’ data from itself: Datatreasury Corporation v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 8:14 am by Brian Cuban
The statute under which the hecklers were arrested reads as follows: “Every person, who, without authority of law, willfully disturbs or breaks up any assembly or meeting that is not unlawful in its character, other than an assembly or meeting referred to in Section 302 of the Penal Code….. is guilty of a misdemeanor” In Hill v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm by Erin Miller
United States Docket: 09-342 Issues: (1) What constitutes the proper denominator in the takings fraction under Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  According to King, Van Houten refused to meet on a regular basis, proclaimed himself to be a "cowboy" and stated that he would "just get it done". [read post]