Search for: "State v. Money"
Results 6481 - 6500
of 20,515
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2013, 8:14 pm
Fifield v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:31 am
Virtumundo Is SOPA’s “Follow the Money” Meme Infecting Anti-Spam Litigation? [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 5:56 am
Vanity plates generate a lot of money for the state because people are willing to pay a fee to broadcast their personalities to the world. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 6:50 pm
The Court concluded there were extensive human rights violations and ordered the State to provide specialized medical assistance to the victims, pay compensation for both material losses and pain and suffering, and publicly acknowledge its wrongdoing. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 2:58 pm
From Bragg v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 3:11 am
In Kershaw v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 11:36 am
But keep an eye out: In re Hill (City National Bank v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
On June 23, 2021, the United States Supreme Court held in a 6-3 ruling written by Chief Justice John Roberts in Cedar Point Nursery v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 7:03 am
Quadratec, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 1:21 am
In Purcell v Ireland, the Commission (in an admissibility decision) upheld a reporting ban on Sinn Fein stating “The restrictions are designed to deny representatives of known terrorist organisations and their political supporters the possibility of using the broadcast media as a platform for advocating their cause, encouraging support for their organisations and conveying the impression of their legitimacy. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:26 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 11:47 am
Only five states allow for “hedonic” damages, or money to account for the deceased’s loss of enjoyment of future life. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 8:52 am
Rose v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 3:38 pm
Ed. 2d 640 (1981); see also United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 11:27 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:35 am
Supreme Court cases beginning with Plessy v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 2:49 am
Centurion Capital Corp. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 3:00 pm
The justices held that the Eighth Amendment protects people from state and local authorities’ abusive reliance on monetary penalties to raise money. [read post]
28 Apr 2025, 2:00 pm
It points to the Supreme Court’s 1982 decision in Rendell-Baker v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 3:10 am
CPLR 305 (b) provides: If the complaint is not served with the summons, the summons shall contain or have attached thereto a notice stating the nature of the action and the relief sought and, except in an action for medical malpractice, the sum of money for which judgment may be taken in case of default. [read post]
