Search for: "State v. Whited"
Results 6481 - 6500
of 13,537
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2016, 11:12 am
Only one summary disposition involves criminal law.Kernan v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 10:39 am
In the United States, there is, of course Feist Publication, Inc. v Rural Telephone Service Company, on telephone directories, and Victor Lalli Enterprises, Inc. v Big Red Apple, Inc. [read post]
16 May 2016, 9:32 am
The decision in question is United States v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 9:32 am
The decision in question is United States v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 8:58 am
We also see a crescendo in White House involvement in patents: patents are mentioned in the state of the union, there is discussion of the patent troll debate (in a Google hangout no less!) [read post]
16 May 2016, 7:53 am
It took Thurgood Marshall and the NAACP decades to win Brown v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 7:00 am
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Indecent exposure Following a bench trial in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, Mario Malik White, appellant, was convicted of two counts of indecent exposure and one count each of disorderly conduct and disturbing the peace. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm
The media news this week was dominated by the release of the long awaited White Paper, A BBC for the future: a broadcaster of distinction [pdf] . [read post]
15 May 2016, 3:00 am
"On H-Net is a review of Karine V. [read post]
14 May 2016, 4:59 am
Luis v. [read post]
14 May 2016, 4:59 am
Luis v. [read post]
14 May 2016, 4:59 am
Luis v. [read post]
13 May 2016, 5:27 pm
White Dragon Prods. v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 2:00 pm
’State v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 10:38 am
The book ends by considering Beyonce’s appropriation of a white Belgian choreographer’s work, which Kraut considers to be reversing the “racialized logic of property that helped underwrite the development of choreographic copyright in the United States. [read post]
11 May 2016, 8:00 am
Uppal v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 3:24 am
United States, concluding that “this result doesn’t represent some new watershed in white collar crime or dramatic expansion of federal criminal jurisdiction. [read post]
10 May 2016, 10:21 am
The Constitution of 1988 took the morality issue so seriously that, according to article 85(V), the president of the Republic may be criminally charged and lose his/her mandate in case of acts against administrative probity. [read post]
10 May 2016, 5:44 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger criticizes a recent story in The Washington Post on the Court’s recent decision in Hurst v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 1:38 pm
” [7] United States v. [read post]
