Search for: "True v True"
Results 6481 - 6500
of 33,951
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2011, 8:46 am
Complaint Fantasies v vs Fantasies(function() { var scribd = document.createElement("script"); scribd.type = "text/javascript"; scribd.async = true; scribd.src = "http://www.scribd.com/javascripts/embed_code/inject.js"; var s = document.getElementsByTagName("script")[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(scribd, s); })(); [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 6:46 pm
Butis this true? [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 6:15 pm
This was particularly (but not always) true with respect to references to the president. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 12:08 pm
If the allegations are true, Joliet doesn't appear to have a leg on which to stand. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 6:00 pm
Sure.But, in this case, for whatever reason, I'm not inclined to bend over backwards to put up roadblocks to doing what -- for this particular person -- seems clearly the right call.Maybe Judge Berzon's correct that Judge Bybee has blinded me to the true issues. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
Even if its true that some shareholders will use access as a "soapbox," the additional "costs" of such an approach are unclear. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 8:48 pm
As I'm wont to do.Basically, I argued that even if you started providing pot beforehand, the Compassionate Use Act would still immunize any future provision of weed undertaken after you became a true primary caregiver, and hence that the Court's requirement that a defendant not provide pot beforehand was erroneous. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 5:11 am
After reviewing the relevant law, the Court concluded that the enabling state law, Article 66B, grants considerable discretion to the counties in how they establish land use regulations, ranging from the comprehensive plan being anything from a mere guide to a true regulatory device, notwithstanding Article 66B's phrase "use that conforms to the plan" to describe a "special exception".Turning to the implementation of a comprehensive plan by Allegheny County, the… [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 11:33 am
On the theory -- an undeniably true one -- that it could have been his next-door neighbor's computer he got the files from, or someone in-state; on Limewire, it's almost impossible to tell. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 7:53 am
Butis this true? [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 11:58 am
Even if true, that still wouldn't justify the Court entering briefing orders that it has no intention of enforcing, and that everyone knows are meaningless. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:00 pm
" The numbers did not hold true for injuries. 49,939 people were injured in car wrecks in metro Atlanta, whereas 39,670 were injured in car accidents on rural Georgia roads. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 5:15 pm
After a three week High Court trial Mr Justice Nicol found that the allegation was true ([2020] EWHC 2911 (QB)). [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 12:56 pm
Not true. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:30 am
If it isn't fully true, it certainly ought to be, right?] [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 12:04 pm
I guess that's true, if by "no evidence" we mean "no evidence that the CEO hasn't shredded, and as long as the CEO testifies he didn't know, we can't disprove his completely self-interested assertion. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:02 pm
So think that this is really my true belief.It's not that Justice Kane doesn't have a point. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 11:45 am
But even if that particular example is true, the intent to defraud response still knocks out the overwhelming majority of the other scenarios that AK articulates in his opinion, which don't involve an intent to defraud. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 9:40 am
None of what the witness says is true. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 7:38 pm
So that is not your true intent to vote guilty for -- I'm not going to designate which count, but your guilty verdict was because you felt compelled or pressured because the other jurors were voting that way; is that correct? [read post]
