Search for: "United States v. Herring" Results 6481 - 6500 of 23,155
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2024, 3:55 am by SHG
United States, better known as the Kids Climate case, at first appeared to be one of those goofy cases that stood no chance of surviving. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm by Law Lady
 Billing Fraud: VIRGINIA FEDERAL JUDGE WON'T DISMISS MEDICARE FRAUD DEFENDANTS, United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
The departure from Abdulaziz  The Secretary of State relied on Abdulaziz v United Kingdom (1985) 7 EHRR 471 in which the Strasbourg Court held that there was no lack of respect for family life in denying entry to foreign spouses. [read post]
23 May 2008, 10:17 pm
Cir. 1984), which awarded children surviving a plane crash medical monitoring to diagnose future impact-related injuries, and the state’s Doe v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:49 am
United States, a 1967 case in which a listening device was placed on the outside of a public telephone booth. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 4:08 am by Stephen Page
25 March 2010, more than 50 judges and other experts from Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, France, Egypt, Germany, India, Mexico, New Zealand, Pakistan, Spain, United Kingdom and the United States of America, including experts from the Hague Conference on Private International Law and the International Centre for Missing and Exploited Children, met in Washington, D.C. to discuss cross? [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 2:50 pm by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
In support of such informal abandonment, the taxpayer cited United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
 There is still time to register for the Supreme Court Historical Society's commemoration of Juneteenth, a conversation with Judge Curtis Collier and the Society’s Executive Director, Jim Duff, on the lynching of Ed Johnson in 1906 and the resulting US Supreme Court decisions, United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am by Wolfgang Demino
However, the court stated that if, at trial, the defendants were able to prove that Madden had received the Cardholder Agreement and Change In Terms, and that FIA had assigned her debt to Midland Funding, her claims would fail as a matter of law because the NBA would preempt any state-law usury claim against the defendants. [read post]