Search for: "Young v. State" Results 6481 - 6500 of 8,892
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2011, 7:19 pm by Gordon Johnson
The “Show Me” State is one of many across the nation to enact such a law. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 3:24 pm by Eilionoir Flynn
The first case, Gauer v France, relates to the sterilisation of young women with disabilities, and the second case, RP v UK, concerns the removal of a child with physical disabilities from the care of its mother (a young woman with intellectual disability) without her consent to the adoption of the child. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:22 am by Aaron Pelley
Byrd: The Court overruled its recent decision in State v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 4:26 pm by R Grace Rodriguez
Park, for Plaintiff and Respondent ING Bank, FSB.OpinionZELON, J.INTRODUCTION *1 Appellant Young America Mortgage (YAM), a mortgage broker, submitted a loan application to Respondent ING Bank on behalf of its client, Jorge Ramon. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 6:38 am
The Court stated that this should be regarded as an upper limit of non-pecuniary loss in catastrophic cases (later, in In Lindal v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 3:34 am
I'm no expert on the machinations of the Supreme Court, but it seems to me that the judgment in Kernott v Jones will not now be handed down until the Michaelmas term, which begins on the third of October. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:35 am by Ken Lammers
By placing a judge in a courtroom the General Assembly is stating that it trusts this judge's discretion in the use of advisement powers. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:26 am by Anita Davies
There is some authority on this point from the United States. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 6:12 pm
Goodlatte's introduction, Proenza Schouler designers Lazaro Hernandez and Jack McCollough testified before members of Congress arguing that the IDPPPA was necessary for young designers. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 11:45 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The Texas Supreme Court issued an opinion in a case in 1998, styled "State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. [read post]