Search for: "Case v. People" Results 6501 - 6520 of 52,001
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2024, 10:06 am by Michael C. Dorf
Quoting a 1948 case, the Court said this in the first Obamacare case, NFIB v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 6:24 am by James Bickford
In other coverage of upcoming cases, the Lakeland (Florida) Ledger discusses Fowler v. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 10:40 am by Amy Howe
ShareThe Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Monday in one of the highest-profile bankruptcies in recent memory: Harrington v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 6:15 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Fort Worth life insurance attorneys will understand why people need an attorney's help in these disputes after reading this case. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 12:43 pm by Earl Drott
If a defendant cannot establish the date of sale, they most likely cannot challenge a product liability claim as untimely, as demonstrated in Jennifer Parks et al. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 6:14 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette has filed amicus briefs in two medical marijuana cases pending in Michigan appellate courts; one case is from Oakland County, the other from Isabella County.The Oakland County case, the well-known People v Redden debacle, involved whether an unregistered marijuana user could nevertheless assert the defenses set forth in the Medical Marijuana Act. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 7:06 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette has filed amicus briefs in two medical marijuana cases pending in Michigan appellate courts; one case is from Oakland County, the other from Isabella County.The Oakland County case, the well-known People v Redden debacle, involved whether an unregistered marijuana user could nevertheless assert the defenses set forth in the Medical Marijuana Act. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 9:23 pm by Afro Leo
       Adidas’ reliance on previous South African judgments and foreign judgments is misplaced and of extremely limited assistance, since those cases cannot assist the factual enquiry and comparative analysis the SCA is enjoined to make on the facts of the case. [read post]