Search for: "Does, 1-25"
Results 6501 - 6520
of 18,562
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2007, 2:56 am
A device according to claim 1, 2, or 3, further comprisin . . . [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 5:01 pm
Thus, the ground for opposition under A 100(a) does not prejudice the maintenance of the patent as granted. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 8:55 pm
He believes in "a lot" of it. 1:26:25 — Huntsman wants to pledge: "no pledges. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 4:11 pm
As of January 1, 2024, any SDVOSB that does not have a pending certification application at SBA (or that has not been SBA-certified), will be ineligible for sole-source or set-aside federal procurements. 3. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 4:08 pm
July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2026); or More than $1 million thereafter. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 4:30 am
However, under Article 13 of the Regulation No 1346/2000, its Article 4(2)(m) does not apply where the person who benefited from an act detrimental to all the creditors provides proof that the said act is subject to the law of a Member State other than that of the State of the opening of proceedings and that law does not allow any means of challenging that act in the relevant case. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 5:50 am
Therefore, the tribunal concluded that the dispute did not fall within Article 8(1), was not covered by Uzbekistan’s consent, and did not meet the consent requirement set out in Article 25(1) of the ICSID Convention (paras. 372-373). [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 5:47 am
Does this prove that regulatory agencies are captured or not regulating in the public interest? [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 3:49 pm
Moreover, MR5 requires these providers, as it does with others, to determine if content is “prohibited. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 1:55 am
Table 1. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 7:59 am
ENNIS, Appellee.No. 02-17-00282-CV.Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth.Delivered: June 28, 2018 Appeal from County Court AT Law NO. 1 of Tarrant County Trial Court NO. 2014-002225-1-A.PANEL: MEIER, PITTMAN, and BIRDWELL, JJ.OPINIONBILL MEIER, Justice.I. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 9:07 am
After 25 years, it is no longer in effect in this province. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 9:07 am
After 25 years, it is no longer in effect in this province. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 1:19 pm
JANE DOE, is the mother and next friend of JOHN DOE, a minor. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 11:27 pm
Tool Without A Handle: Guerilla Information Warfare “The enemies of liberal democracy hack our feelings of fear and hate and vanity, and then use these feelings to polarize and destroy" - Yuval Noah Harari.[1] Most of the discussion of the report of the Office of the Special Counsel[2] has, understandably focused on the political implications, and interestingly for a report prompted by foreign intelligence operations, it is not really a counterintelligence report.[3] … [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:53 am
Originally, it was used as a way to govern relations between nations, but now it is being utilized by human rights activists in order to hold corporations responsible for acts performed by their subsidiaries which infringe upon the rights of people in foreign nations in which the company resides. [1] The Act reads: “The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action by an alien for a tort only, committed in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the… [read post]
19 May 2012, 11:01 am
However, it has been noted that the translated set of claims of the above translation comprises claims 25 to 29, which were added during the international phase and must therefore be disregarded for the purpose of A 100(c) EPC 1973. [2.2] According to the established case law the findings of the Enlarged Board of Appeal in G 1/05 and G 1/06, although made with regard to European patent applications, are also valid for European patents granted in respect of a divisional… [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 2:55 pm
AB 25 (2019): Civil Code §§ 1798.130, 1798.145 (amended) The California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (“CCPA”) goes into effect on January 1, 2020. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
Sept. 12, 2006) (Order).........................15Tr. of Test. of John Doe No.1, Taylor v.Crawford, No. 05-4173 (W.D. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 1:55 am
Finally, individuals with taxable income over $1 million will be taxed $91,525 plus 10.75 percent on any amount over $1 million. [read post]
